We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • December 05, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • December 05, 2025
AHMI Logo.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Certification
    • Compliance
    • Crime & Security
    • Dealing with Households
    • Income Calculations
    • Maintenance
    • Screening Applicants
  • Departments
    • Dos and Don'ts
    • Q and A
    • Recent Court Rulings
    • HUD Audits
    • In the News
    • Ask the Insider
      • Send Us A Question
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
December 05, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Topics » Assisted Housing Management Insider » Recent Court Rulings

Recent Court Rulings
Recent Court Rulings RSS Feed RSS

Court Backs Agency's Denial of Benefits to Applicant

Apr 24, 2009

Facts: An applicant for public housing in Omaha claimed that she had been unfairly denied participation in the program. The Omaha Housing Authority notified the applicant that she was ineligible for benefits based on the results of a criminal background check performed by the agency. The applicant was unaware of the charges against her at the time of her application, and she has subsequently not plead guilty to or been convicted of the two felony forgery charges ...

Read More

Site Manager Fumbles Eviction Notice

Apr 24, 2009

Facts: A site manager in North Carolina complained to police about possible drug activity in a unit. When police arrived, the resident consented to a search. After the police claimed to find drug paraphernalia and traces of drugs in the unit and wrote a citation against the resident, the site manager sought to evict her. The resident, who rented under a Section 8 subsidy, challenged her eviction in court, claiming that the site had not given her a proper notice o...

Read More

Owners Get Borough to Halt Discriminatory Enforcement

Mar 26, 2009

Facts: Two rental apartment companies sued the Borough of Magnolia, N.J., to stop the Borough from enforcing its property rental ordinances in a manner that infringed on their rights under the Fair Housing Act.

In 2007, the Borough enacted Ordinance 11A, entitled “An Ordinance Creating Landlord Responsibilities,” which included among its provisions:


Read More

Voucher Rejection Is Source-of-Income Discrimination

Mar 26, 2009

Facts: Intending to sell its property, a Washington, D.C., owner stopped participating in the project-based Section 8 program after its HAP contract with HUD expired in 2004. Residents of the site received enhanced vouchers to remain in their units, but when they began offering these vouchers for units at the owner's site, the owner refused to accept them.

Read More

Federal Court Rejects Applicants' Disparate Impact Claim

Mar 26, 2009

Facts: Seventeen Hasidic Jews who had applied for or lived in public housing operated by the New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) challenged NYCHA's Tenant Selection and Assignment Plan (TSAP) as discriminatory in its treatment of Hasidic applicants at three public housing developments in the Williamsburg section of Brooklyn.

Read More

"Continuing" Fair Housing Violations Not Barred by Statute of Limitations

Feb 26, 2009

Facts: Five fair housing organizations sued the builders and owners of 82 multifamily apartment complexes, alleging that the builders constructed the complexes in a manner that denied access to disabled persons, in violation of the Fair Housing Amendments Act. The builders and owners designed and built the apartment complexes, with over 22,000 units, in 10 states between 1991 and 2007.

Read More

Excluding Minors from SROs Promotes Legitimate Interest

Feb 1, 2009

Facts: A New York City resident who occupied two single room occupancy (SRO) units with her minor children challenged a local ordinance prohibiting children under 16 from occupying SROs, arguing that the restriction violates the Fair Housing Act. She sued the City of New York on the ground that the restriction constitutes discrimination on the basis of familial status.

Decision: The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled for ...

Read More

Rental Assistance Terminated After Sex Offender Fails to Register

Feb 1, 2009

Facts: The Maine State Housing Authority (MSHA) discovered that one of its residents had been convicted of child molestation in Washington State in 1996, but was not registered as a sex offender, as the law requires. The resident had been receiving rental assistance through a voucher he obtained initially in Massachusetts. MSHA notified the resident that it was ending his voucher benefits on the ground of program fraud and for other reasons.

Read More

Discontinuing Section 8 Voucher Too Harsh a Penalty

Feb 1, 2009

Facts: A homeless family was declared eligible for a Section 8 housing voucher. The New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) later denied the family continuation of the voucher because they didn't provide access for a Housing Quality Standards inspection. The residents appealed HPD's decision, claiming that it was arbitrary and unreasonable.

Decision: The court ruled for the residents.


Read More

Damages Allowed for Midyear Section 8 Rent Adjustments

Feb 1, 2009

Facts: A New Jersey public housing authority (PHA) and an owner of private housing sued the United States for breaching its obligations under a housing assistance payments (HAP) contract for a housing project. The PHA claimed that the federal government didn't provide rent increases from 2001 to 2007. The PHA sought damages for the portion of the year beginning on Sept. 4, 2001. The federal government argued that rent adjustments take place only on the annive...

Read More
Previous 1 2 … 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 Next
  • Publications
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord v. Tenant
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
  • Additional Links
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Group Subscriptions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
  • Boards of Advisors
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing