We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 21, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 21, 2025
AHMI Logo.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Certification
    • Compliance
    • Crime & Security
    • Dealing with Households
    • Income Calculations
    • Maintenance
    • Screening Applicants
  • Departments
    • Dos and Don'ts
    • Q and A
    • Recent Court Rulings
    • HUD Audits
    • In the News
    • Ask the Insider
      • Send Us A Question
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
May 21, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Excluding Minors from SROs Promotes Legitimate Interest

Excluding Minors from SROs Promotes Legitimate Interest

Feb 1, 2009

Facts: A New York City resident who occupied two single room occupancy (SRO) units with her minor children challenged a local ordinance prohibiting children under 16 from occupying SROs, arguing that the restriction violates the Fair Housing Act. She sued the City of New York on the ground that the restriction constitutes discrimination on the basis of familial status.

Decision: The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled for the City of New York.

Reasoning: Limitations on facilities in SROs, such as the fact that the bathroom is not within a household's living space and is shared with nonfamily members, pose a risk for “children's health and safety and… heir privacy and development,” the court said. In addition, there was no evidence for the resident's claim that prohibiting families from living in SROs “puts them out on the street,” the court said, because other living arrangements are within the resident's means. Consequently, the court ruled that the ordinance excluding minor children from SROs was based on legitimate concerns about their health, safety, and welfare, which cannot be achieved through other means and, therefore, does not violate the Fair Housing Act.

  • Sierra v. City of New York, October 2008
Recent Court Rulings
    • Related Articles

      PHA Didn't Take Away Voucher Holder's Property Interest

      Partial Rent Payment from PHA Doesn't Bar Eviction Case

      Owner Improperly Removed Daughter from Household Composition

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing