Owner Wins

RSS

Facts: Under the right of eminent domain, a city took over a portion of a tenant's leased space. The portion, which the city planned to use in order to complete a road project, amounted to five out of 107 parking spaces that were part of the leased space. The space also included a building and outdoor area.

Facts: The owners of a shopping center sued the anchor tenant, a grocery store, after a dispute arose over the tenant's use of common areas behind the store. The trial court found that the tenant violated its lease by placing large, seasonal storage containers in the center's parking spaces, but also concluded that the tenant's practice of keeping bread racks and similar items in parking spaces was permissible under lease provisions allowing the use o...

Facts: A tenant that leased two shopping center storefronts through a management company signed identical leases for each unit. Both leases included provisions obligating the tenant to pay its pro rata share of operating expenses for the entire property, and to contract with Waste Management Spokane for its own garbage disposal for the two units, which it did initially.

Facts: A tenant purchased the rights to run a dealership that was part of a franchised chain. The dealership was already operating out of a building that housed its showroom and offices, so the tenant decided to stay in that location, leasing the building and the property it was on from its owner. The tenant and owner signed a lease on Dec. 12, 1983, followed by two subsequent leases over the course of several years.

Facts: An owner claimed that a tenant failed to pay rent and other charges in the lease when due and additionally owed holdover rent for the third and fourth years of the tenancy. Including late fees and interest, the owner claimed that the tenant owed it more than $3.1 million.

The tenant alleged that the owner was unjustly enriched by the tenant's expenditures, including monies expended for landscaping, water, and garbage collection.

Facts: A retail tenant sued Burbank Mall Associates on the basis of unjustified delay in turning over the keys to the premises. The trial court ruled in favor of the owner.

Facts: A tenant operated a business in a building that the local government was planning to designate as blighted—that is, obsolete with a marginal economic use. Before the final decision was made, the local government sent out hearing notices to the owner of the building in the event that it wanted to attend the meeting and contest the blight designation.

Facts: One year into a five-year lease agreement, a tenant stopped paying rent. After the owner demanded payment, the tenant entered into a separate agreement to bring the rent payments current. The tenant eventually vacated the space. The owner sought additional rent, but the tenant argued that it did not owe the additional rent and claimed that the owner failed to mitigate its damages by not making a reasonable effort to find a new tenant for the premises.

Facts: A tenant signed a lease with the city that contained several 10-year renewal options. The lease stated that prior to exercising the option, the tenant must give a six-month notice of its intention to renew.

Facts: A tenant leased 4,375 square feet in a building and hired a contractor to do the buildout of the space. The contractor hired a subcontractor to do the work. Upon completion of the work, the tenant paid the contractor, but the contractor failed to pay the subcontractor.