We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • December 05, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • December 05, 2025
The Habitat Group Logo
December 05, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Landlord Must Stand Trial for Negligence to Customers that Tenant Sexually Assaulted

Landlord Must Stand Trial for Negligence to Customers that Tenant Sexually Assaulted

Oct 30, 2024

What Happened: A Utah shopping center leased property for use as a massage therapy center, even though the tenant didn’t have a license to provide those services in the state. Four years later, three customers claimed that the tenant sexually assaulted them during their massage appointments and sued the landlord for negligence. The landlord denied owing a duty of reasonable care to the customers and asked the court to dismiss the case. The court rejected the motion.

Ruling: The Utah appeals court agreed that the landlord owed the customers a legal duty and ordered a trial. 

Reasoning: The landlord contended that the lower court was wrong to conclude that a commercial landlord has a legal duty to customers to verify that a tenant has a required license to operate. But that’s not what the lower court had ruled, said the appeals court. What the court actually said was that under state law, commercial landlords owe “a categorical duty of care to third parties/invitees,” including the customers in this case, to exercise reasonable care to keep the premises in a reasonably safe condition.” So, the lower court was right to deny the motion to dismiss. However, the appeals court faulted its analysis of whether the alleged sexual assaults were reasonably foreseeable.

  • D.W. v. FPA Sandy Mall Assocs., 2024 UT 32, 2024 Utah LEXIS 93
Owner Loses
    • Related Articles

      Landlord Can't Prove that Mall Tenant Failed to Maintain Food Court

      Subtenant That Vacates on Time Need Not Pay Holdover Rent to Tenant

      Jury Trial Waiver in Guaranty Doesn’t Bind Non-Signatory Tenant

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing