• NY Apartment Law
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Guidebooks
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
  • Model Lease Clauses
  • Q&A
  • Dos & Don'ts
  • Recent Court Rulings
  • eAlerts
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • NY Apartment Law
  • New York Apartment Law Insider
  • New York Landlord V. Tenant
  • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
  • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
  • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Fair Housing Coach
  • Assisted Housing Management Insider
  • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
  • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Commercial Lease Law Insider
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Main Articles
  • Features
  • Broker's Buzz
  • Drafting Tips
  • In the News
  • Negotiating Tips
  • Plugging Loopholes
  • Traps to Avoid
  • Model Lease Clauses
  • Model Lease Clauses
  • Model Agreements
  • Other Model Tools
  • Q&A
  • Q&A
  • Pop Quiz
  • Winners & Losers
  • Ask the Insider
  • Recent Court Rulings
  • Landlord Wins
  • Landlord Loses
May 29, 2025
We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 29, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 29, 2025
CLLI_logo_2020.jpg
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Broker's Buzz
    • Drafting Tips
    • In the News
    • Negotiating Tips
    • Plugging Loopholes
    • Traps to Avoid
  • Model Lease Clauses
    • Model Lease Clauses
    • Model Agreements
    • Other Model Tools
  • Q&A
    • Q&A
    • Pop Quiz
    • Winners & Losers
    • Ask the Insider
  • Dos & Don'ts
  • Recent Court Rulings
    • Landlord Wins
    • Landlord Loses
  • eAlerts
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
May 29, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Tenant's Failure to Carry Required Insurance Is Grounds to Evict

Tenant's Failure to Carry Required Insurance Is Grounds to Evict

May 28, 2024

What Happened: A convenience store tenant signed a lease requiring it to carry certain insurance at its sole cost and expense during the lease term, including at least $1 million in general liability insurance, worker’s compensation insurance required by law, and plate glass insurance. The tenant also agreed that it would obtain the liability insurance from a reputable and independent insurer rated at least “A” by Best’s Insurance Guide. The tenant kept none of these promises, and the landlord sued to evict.

Ruling: The New York court awarded the landlord summary judgment.

Reasoning: It was pretty much an open-and-shut case. According to the court, it’s “well settled” that a commercial tenant’s “failure to maintain insurance as required by the parties’ lease is an incurable defect and a material breach of the lease.” And, as even the tenant acknowledged, it didn’t live up to its insurance duties under the lease:

  • It allowed its liability insurance to lapse for a full year;
  • The liability insurance coverage it did obtain was for less than $1 million and came from a provider rated below “A”; and
  • It never obtained the required additional workers’ comp or plate glass insurance.

Nor did the tenant raise any valid defenses. Its argument that it was the landlord’s responsibility to cure insurance defects and then charge the tenant for any necessary additional fees was nothing more than a conclusion of law without supporting facts, the court concluded. 

  • 191 Chelsea LLC v. Sal’s Convenience Corp., 2024 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1635, 2024 NY Slip Op 50377(U)
Owner Wins
    • Related Articles

      Allowing Illegal Cannabis Sales in Space Is Grounds to Evict Convenience Store Tenant

      Failure to Complete Improvements Is Grounds for Eviction

      Tenant on Hook for Failure to Obtain Insurance

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing