• NY Apartment Law
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Guidebooks
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
  • Departments
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • NY Apartment Law
  • New York Apartment Law Insider
  • New York Landlord V. Tenant
  • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
  • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
  • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Fair Housing Coach
  • Assisted Housing Management Insider
  • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
  • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Commercial Lease Law Insider
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Main Articles
  • Features
  • Certification
  • Compliance
  • Crime & Security
  • Dealing with Households
  • Income Calculations
  • Maintenance
  • Screening Applicants
  • Departments
  • Dos and Don'ts
  • Q and A
  • Recent Court Rulings
  • HUD Audits
  • In the News
  • Ask the Insider
  • Ask the Insider
  • Send Us A Question
May 22, 2025
We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 22, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 22, 2025
AHMI Logo.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Certification
    • Compliance
    • Crime & Security
    • Dealing with Households
    • Income Calculations
    • Maintenance
    • Screening Applicants
  • Departments
    • Dos and Don'ts
    • Q and A
    • Recent Court Rulings
    • HUD Audits
    • In the News
    • Ask the Insider
      • Send Us A Question
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
May 22, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Owner Not Required to Move Resident to Two-Bedroom Unit

Owner Not Required to Move Resident to Two-Bedroom Unit

Mar 16, 2015

Facts: A disabled African-American resident sued a New York owner for discrimination based on her race or her disability. The resident lives in a one-bedroom unit with a daughter who’s also her live-in aide. According to the owner, the resident never added her daughter as an additional tenant to the lease or as a live-in aid. The resident claimed that even though her name was the next and only name on the waiting list for a two-bedroom unit at the site, the management unreasonably denied her the unit.

The resident also complained that the management decided to install carpet in the two-bedroom unit against her wishes. Notwithstanding the manager’s intent not to offer the unit to her mother, the daughter viewed the unit and told the manager not to install carpet until her mother was allowed to see the unit. Specifically, she told the manager that her mother would not want carpet because “bed bugs thrive in carpet.”

The resident claims that the decision to install the carpet clearly indicated the decision had already been made to violate her fair housing rights and that she was denied the “same rights as the current Caucasian family and the prior Asian family” because both families were “allowed not to have carpet forced upon them prior to tenancy and both were never . . . forced to have carpet after they accepted [the] tenancy.”

In addition, the resident complained the owner retaliated against her in violation of the Fair Housing Act and New York State Human Rights Law by sending letters to her regarding the status of recertification, painting, and unit inspection requirements. The owner asked the court to dismiss the resident’s case.

Ruling: A New York district court granted the owner’s request.

Reasoning: Housing discrimination claims under the Fair Housing Act and the New York Human Rights Law require the resident to show that she qualified for an available benefit and was denied that benefit. Here, the resident didn’t try to add her daughter to the household or qualify her as a live-in aide, as the manager had explained was necessary to comply with HUD regulations and thus qualify for the benefit that she sought.

In a letter, the manager had explained that based on the resident’s last recertification, she’s considered a household of one person, and for her daughter to reside in her unit as her primary residence, the resident could either request that her daughter be added to the household (in which case management must include her income and assets to the household) or provide documentation satisfactory to HUD to qualify her daughter as a live-in aide. The manager then provided the regulations for the HUD Section 8 program concerning the eligibility requirements for a live-in aide who is also a relative of a tenant.

The regulations require, among other things, that: (1) the owner verify that the resident requires the support of a live-in aide because of a disability-related need; (2) the live-in aide undergo screening for drug activity, creditworthiness, and criminal activity; and (3) the screening process be the one the owner has established for new applicants and additions to households. Accordingly, the manager had explained, that in order to consider the request for a two-bedroom unit, management must verify that her need for a live-in aide is a disability-related need.

With regard to the retaliation claims, the court stated the recertification, painting, and unit inspection letters were not adverse actions within the meaning of the Fair Housing Act. To be actionable, an adverse action must have some materially adverse effect on the resident. The resident didn’t state how the letters adversely affected them.

  • Wilson v. Wilder Balter Partners, Inc., February 2015
Recent Court Rulings
      • Related Articles

        Resident Must Move to One-Bedroom or Pay Market Rate

        Owner Not Required to Give Resident Opportunity to Cure Criminal Conduct

        PHA Not Required to Grant Resident’s Transfer Request

      Popular Stories

      • How to Handle Income Changes from the Social Security Fairness Act

        Apr 11, 2025
        Feature
        By Eric Yoo
      • HUD Delays Implementation of HOME Final Rule Amid Regulatory Freeze

        Feb 14, 2025
        Feature
        By Eric Yoo
      • Publications
        • Assisted Housing Management Insider
        • Commercial Lease Law Insider
        • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
        • Fair Housing Coach
        • New York Apartment Law Insider
        • New York Landlord v. Tenant
        • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
      • Additional Links
        • Contact Us
        • Advertise
        • Group Subscriptions
        • Privacy Policy
      • Boards of Advisors
        • Assisted Housing Management Insider
        • Commercial Lease Law Insider
        • Fair Housing Coach
        • New York Apartment Law Insider
        • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
      ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing
      The Habitat Group Logo
      • NY Apartment Law
        • New York Apartment Law Insider
        • New York Landlord V. Tenant
        • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
        • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
        • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
      • Fair & Affordable Housing
        • Fair Housing Coach
        • Assisted Housing Management Insider
        • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
        • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
      • Commercial Lease Law
        • Commercial Lease Law Insider
        • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
          • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
        • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
      • Guidebooks
      • May 22, 2025
      • Log In
      • Log Out
      • My Account
      • Subscribe
      • May 22, 2025
      AHMI Logo.webp
      • Archives
      • Main Articles
        • Features
        • Certification
        • Compliance
        • Crime & Security
        • Dealing with Households
        • Income Calculations
        • Maintenance
        • Screening Applicants
      • Departments
        • Dos and Don'ts
        • Q and A
        • Recent Court Rulings
        • HUD Audits
        • In the News
        • Ask the Insider
          • Send Us A Question
      • eAlerts
      • Blogs
      Free Issue
      The Habitat Group Logo
      May 22, 2025
      • Log In
      • Log Out
      • My Account