• NY Apartment Law
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Guidebooks
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
  • Departments
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • NY Apartment Law
  • New York Apartment Law Insider
  • New York Landlord V. Tenant
  • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
  • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
  • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Fair Housing Coach
  • Assisted Housing Management Insider
  • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
  • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Commercial Lease Law Insider
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Main Articles
  • Features
  • Certification
  • Compliance
  • Crime & Security
  • Dealing with Households
  • Income Calculations
  • Maintenance
  • Screening Applicants
  • Departments
  • Dos and Don'ts
  • Q and A
  • Recent Court Rulings
  • HUD Audits
  • In the News
  • Ask the Insider
  • Ask the Insider
  • Send Us A Question
May 22, 2025
We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 22, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 22, 2025
AHMI Logo.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Certification
    • Compliance
    • Crime & Security
    • Dealing with Households
    • Income Calculations
    • Maintenance
    • Screening Applicants
  • Departments
    • Dos and Don'ts
    • Q and A
    • Recent Court Rulings
    • HUD Audits
    • In the News
    • Ask the Insider
      • Send Us A Question
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
May 22, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Federal Judge Strikes Down HUD’s Disparate Impact Rule

Federal Judge Strikes Down HUD’s Disparate Impact Rule

Nov 19, 2014

Facts: Two nonprofit insurance trade associations filed a lawsuit against HUD, challenging its final rule providing for liability based on disparate impact under the Fair Housing Act (FHA). HUD had recently finalized regulations that were intended to codify how a disparate impact claim is established, including the respective burdens that the plaintiffs and defendants must carry. Under “disparate impact,” a person may be held liable for discriminatory conduct under the FHA without any showing of actual intent to discriminate. To make out a basic case, all that’s necessary is statistical evidence that a policy or practice had a harsher effect–a “disparate impact”–on a class protected by the FHA.

The associations claim that HUD violated the Administrative Procedure Act by exceeding its statutory authority when it expanded the scope of the FHA to recognize not only disparate-treatment claims but also disparate-impact claims. They also claimed that the disparate impact regulation would dramatically impair their ability to assess premiums based on risk, and that it was preempted by the McCarran-Ferguson Act, which reserves most regulation of insurance companies to the states, rather than the federal government.

Ruling: The District Court for the District of Columbia ruled for the trade associations.

Reasoning: The court agreed that the FHA prohibits disparate treatment only, and that the defendant, therefore, exceeded its authority under the FHA. And thus the court vacated the disparate impact rule.

  • American Insurance Association v. HUD, November 2014

Editor’s Note: Although this ruling was a win for the American Insurance Association and other business groups that oppose disparate impact claims, which allow for a broad range of business decisions related to housing to be subject to civil rights litigation, the immediate impact of this decision is limited. That’s because the U.S. Supreme Court in October said it would take up a related case and is likely to decide by the end of June once and for all whether the Fair Housing Act allows for disparate impact lawsuits. In his opinion, the federal judge of this case wrote, “the Supreme Court is now perfectly positioned . . . to finally address this issue in the not-to-distant future.”

The case is Texas Dept. of Housing and Community Affairs v. the Inclusive Communities, which held that policies used to allocate low-income housing tax credits in that state had a disparate impact on housing opportunities for some minorities and therefore violated the FHA.

The Fair Housing Act, passed in 1968, doesn’t specifically allow disparate impact claims, but courts have permitted lawsuits making such allegations for decades. The Supreme Court has never ruled on the issue. In recent years, the high court has twice agreed to hear a disparate impact case, but both times the dispute was settled before the justices could rule.

Recent Court Rulings
      • Related Articles

        Federal Court Rejects Applicants' Disparate Impact Claim

        Texas Federal Judge Rules Eviction Moratorium Is Unconstitutional

        Federal Court Refuses to Resolve Dispute Over HUD Grant

      • Publications
        • Assisted Housing Management Insider
        • Commercial Lease Law Insider
        • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
        • Fair Housing Coach
        • New York Apartment Law Insider
        • New York Landlord v. Tenant
        • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
      • Additional Links
        • Contact Us
        • Advertise
        • Group Subscriptions
        • Privacy Policy
      • Boards of Advisors
        • Assisted Housing Management Insider
        • Commercial Lease Law Insider
        • Fair Housing Coach
        • New York Apartment Law Insider
        • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
      ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing
      The Habitat Group Logo
      • NY Apartment Law
        • New York Apartment Law Insider
        • New York Landlord V. Tenant
        • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
        • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
        • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
      • Fair & Affordable Housing
        • Fair Housing Coach
        • Assisted Housing Management Insider
        • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
        • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
      • Commercial Lease Law
        • Commercial Lease Law Insider
        • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
          • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
        • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
      • Guidebooks
      • May 22, 2025
      • Log In
      • Log Out
      • My Account
      • Subscribe
      • May 22, 2025
      AHMI Logo.webp
      • Archives
      • Main Articles
        • Features
        • Certification
        • Compliance
        • Crime & Security
        • Dealing with Households
        • Income Calculations
        • Maintenance
        • Screening Applicants
      • Departments
        • Dos and Don'ts
        • Q and A
        • Recent Court Rulings
        • HUD Audits
        • In the News
        • Ask the Insider
          • Send Us A Question
      • eAlerts
      • Blogs
      Free Issue
      The Habitat Group Logo
      May 22, 2025
      • Log In
      • Log Out
      • My Account