We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • December 06, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • December 06, 2025
tchmi.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Certification
    • Compliance
    • Income Calculations
    • Maintenance
    • Rents
    • Verification
  • Dealing with…
    • Dealing with Employees
    • Dealing with Households
    • Dealing with Owners
    • Dealing with the IRS
    • Dealing with State Housing Agency
  • Departments
    • Dos & Donts
    • In the News
    • Private Letter Rulings
    • Q&A
    • Ask the Insider
  • eAlerts
Free Access
The Habitat Group Logo
December 06, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Federal Judge Rules Fair Housing Law Protects Colorado LGBT Couple

Federal Judge Rules Fair Housing Law Protects Colorado LGBT Couple

Apr 12, 2017

A U.S. district judge recently ruled that a Colorado landlord’s refusal to rent to a lesbian couple, one of whom is transgender, violates federal housing law. The ruling is the first in which a court has extended protections to people based on their sexual orientation or gender identity under the federal Fair Housing Act. The act bars housing discrimination because of race, religion, and sex, among other factors.

In his opinion, the judge cited the Supreme Court’s 1989 ruling in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, an employment discrimination case. The justices held that bias against a woman judged insufficiently feminine, among other things, by male partners was a form of sexual stereotyping and therefore fit the definition of “sex” in Title VII, the law barring job discrimination.

“Such stereotypical norms are no different from other stereotypes associated with women, such as the way she should dress or act (e.g., that a woman should not be overly aggressive, or should not act macho), and are products of sex stereotyping,” the judge wrote.

Online Alerts
    • Related Articles

      Federal Judge Rejects HUD's Disparate Impact Rule

      Philadelphia LGBT-Friendly Affordable Senior Housing Awarded $11M in Tax Credit Financing

      California Awards More than $146 Million in Federal and State Housing Tax Credits

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing