We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 25, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 25, 2025
tchmi.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Certification
    • Compliance
    • Income Calculations
    • Maintenance
    • Rents
    • Verification
  • Dealing with…
    • Dealing with Employees
    • Dealing with Households
    • Dealing with Owners
    • Dealing with the IRS
    • Dealing with State Housing Agency
  • Departments
    • Dos & Donts
    • In the News
    • Private Letter Rulings
    • Q&A
    • Ask the Insider
  • eAlerts
Free Access
The Habitat Group Logo
May 25, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » AFFH HUD Rule Follows Supreme Court’s Disparate Impact Decision

AFFH HUD Rule Follows Supreme Court’s Disparate Impact Decision

Jul 24, 2015

Since the U.S. Supreme Court decided to uphold the disparate impact doctrine as a legal tool to fight discrimination in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project Inc., HUD has followed with a new rule that jurisdictions accepting federal housing dollars not only have to avoid discrimination but work actively to reduce racial disparities in communities—or "affirmatively further fair housing" (AFFH), in the language of the rule. That concept was part of the 1968 Fair Housing Act, but had never been enforced very seriously.

In practice, this means that HUD is going to provide extensive data to communities, highlighting racial differences in jobs, education, and access to transportation in their areas. Local housing authorities or other agencies will have to hold public meetings to discuss their findings and then incorporate ideas for how to address segregation in their master plans every five years, or risk losing federal housing dollars.

The court decision and the new rule could together encourage more affordable housing to be built in middle-class or affluent neighborhoods, as opposed to the standard pattern of building public housing in low-income areas.

Online Alerts
    • Related Articles

      Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Texas Disparate Impact Case

      Texas Asks Supreme Court for Decision in Housing Bias Dispute

      Federal Judge Rejects HUD's Disparate Impact Rule

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing