• NY Apartment Law
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Guidebooks
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
  • Dealing with…
  • Departments
  • eAlerts
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • NY Apartment Law
  • New York Apartment Law Insider
  • New York Landlord V. Tenant
  • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
  • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
  • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Fair Housing Coach
  • Assisted Housing Management Insider
  • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
  • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Commercial Lease Law Insider
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Main Articles
  • Features
  • Certification
  • Compliance
  • Income Calculations
  • Maintenance
  • Rents
  • Verification
  • Dealing with…
  • Dealing with Employees
  • Dealing with Households
  • Dealing with Owners
  • Dealing with the IRS
  • Dealing with State Housing Agency
  • Departments
  • Dos & Donts
  • In the News
  • Private Letter Rulings
  • Q&A
  • Ask the Insider
May 25, 2025
We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 25, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 25, 2025
tchmi.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Certification
    • Compliance
    • Income Calculations
    • Maintenance
    • Rents
    • Verification
  • Dealing with…
    • Dealing with Employees
    • Dealing with Households
    • Dealing with Owners
    • Dealing with the IRS
    • Dealing with State Housing Agency
  • Departments
    • Dos & Donts
    • In the News
    • Private Letter Rulings
    • Q&A
    • Ask the Insider
  • eAlerts
Free Access
The Habitat Group Logo
May 25, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Court Finds Texas Housing Agency Guilty of Discrimination

Court Finds Texas Housing Agency Guilty of Discrimination

Mar 28, 2012

A judge of a Dallas Federal District Court recently ruled that the largest program to create affordable housing in Texas violates fair housing law by disproportionately building apartments in poor minority neighborhoods while placing few projects in affluent areas that are mostly white.

Although the ruling came in response to a 2008 lawsuit that focused on Dallas, it could potentially have a sweeping impact on how Texas runs the program, which will disperse about $55 million in tax credits this year. The agency that oversees the money, the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs (TDHCA), has 60 days to submit a plan to correct the disparity, according to the order issued by U.S. District Court Judge Sidney Fitzwater.

The ruling represents a costly and stinging defeat to TDHCA, which has spent about $1.6 million to defend the lawsuit. The fair housing group in Dallas that filed the lawsuit, the Inclusive Communities Project, claimed that TDHCA deliberately used race as a factor when it made choices about how to allocate the money. The group found that in Dallas, 85 percent of tax credit-funded apartments were in areas where minorities made up at least 70 percent of the population.

Fitzwater stopped short of blaming the housing agency for the disparity. That was a key victory for TDHCA, which contended that it has little discretion over which projects win the federal subsidy.

In its legal defense, TDHCA emphasized that it dispenses money according to a complex set of scoring criteria that is mostly dictated by state and federal laws. Developers compete every year for a limited amount of tax credits, which allow them to raise money to cover construction costs.

Online Alerts
    • Related Articles

      Supreme Court Hears Texas LIHTC Housing Discrimination Case

      Housing Agency Accused of Discrimination in Allocation of Tax Credits

      Texas Asks Supreme Court for Decision in Housing Bias Dispute

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing