• NY Apartment Law
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Guidebooks
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
  • Dealing with…
  • Departments
  • eAlerts
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • NY Apartment Law
  • New York Apartment Law Insider
  • New York Landlord V. Tenant
  • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
  • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
  • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Fair Housing Coach
  • Assisted Housing Management Insider
  • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
  • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Commercial Lease Law Insider
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Main Articles
  • Features
  • Certification
  • Compliance
  • Income Calculations
  • Maintenance
  • Rents
  • Verification
  • Dealing with…
  • Dealing with Employees
  • Dealing with Households
  • Dealing with Owners
  • Dealing with the IRS
  • Dealing with State Housing Agency
  • Departments
  • Dos & Donts
  • In the News
  • Private Letter Rulings
  • Q&A
  • Ask the Insider
May 17, 2025
We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 17, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 17, 2025
tchmi.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Certification
    • Compliance
    • Income Calculations
    • Maintenance
    • Rents
    • Verification
  • Dealing with…
    • Dealing with Employees
    • Dealing with Households
    • Dealing with Owners
    • Dealing with the IRS
    • Dealing with State Housing Agency
  • Departments
    • Dos & Donts
    • In the News
    • Private Letter Rulings
    • Q&A
    • Ask the Insider
  • eAlerts
Free Access
The Habitat Group Logo
May 17, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Waiving the Vacant Unit Rule During Renovation

Waiving the Vacant Unit Rule During Renovation

May 29, 2012

Facts: When a low-income housing tax credit project owner violates the Vacant Unit Rule, all vacant units previously occupied by qualified households lose their low-income status and stop generating tax credits for the owner. A developer of a multi-building site asked the IRS if the Vacant Unit Rule could be waived under certain circumstances related to a necessary renovation.

The developer had elected for the site to be treated as a deep-rent-skewed project, which means that at least 15 percent of the low-income units would be initially occupied by households with gross incomes that did not exceed 40 percent of the area median gross income. During the second year after the completion of the project, the developer discovered extensive damage to the buildings. But because of safety issues and due to engineering reasons, the units had to be vacated during the renovations. All the residents were notified of the damage, told why they had to vacate the units, and were given an estimated time period by which the repairs would be completed and they could return.

To enable residents to reoccupy their low-income units after the renovation was completed, the developer entered into replacement leases with them, and said it would not rent a low-income unit to any other resident unless it had been vacant prior to the renovation or the resident decided not to return to the unit. In addition, the developer agreed to compensate the residents for their estimated cost of temporary housing.

Ruling: The IRS ruled that the developer's low-income units were continuously rented or available for rent, and continuously occupied, during the renovation.

Reasoning: The IRS found that the developer was taking the proper steps to correct the damage to the project within a reasonable period and therefore found the low-income units to be rented or available for rental on a continuous basis. The IRS also reasoned that upon completion of the renovation work, any low-income resident who reoccupies a unit in the project can be treated as a continuing resident of the project for the purposes of the higher income limitation rules of Sections 142(d)(3) and (4) of the Code.

  • PLR 142013-08, No. 200923008 (6/5/09)
Private Letter Rulings
    • Related Articles

      Excluding Garages from Eligible Basis Calculations, Gross Rent

      Tax-Exempt Bond Issuer Can Amend Form 8038 After Making Clerical Error

      Easement Relocation Costs Includible in Site's Eligible Basis

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing