• NY Apartment Law
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Guidebooks
  • Archives
  • Protected Classes
  • Management Issues
  • eAlerts
  • Resources
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • NY Apartment Law
  • New York Apartment Law Insider
  • New York Landlord V. Tenant
  • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
  • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
  • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Fair Housing Coach
  • Assisted Housing Management Insider
  • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
  • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Commercial Lease Law Insider
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Protected Classes
  • All Protected Classes
  • Disability
  • Familial Status/Age
  • Race/Color/National Origin
  • Religion
  • Sex/Sexual Orientation
  • Other Classes
  • Management Issues
  • Accommodations
  • Advertising/Applications
  • Complaints/Investigations
  • Employees/Contractors
  • Eviction
  • Leasing
  • Other Issues
  • eAlerts
  • Cases and Settlements
  • HUD News
  • Reports & Studies
  • Other
  • Resources
  • Fair Housing Coach Resources
May 31, 2025
We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 31, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 31, 2025
FHC Logo.webp
  • Archives
  • Protected Classes
    • All Protected Classes
    • Disability
    • Familial Status/Age
    • Race/Color/National Origin
    • Religion
    • Sex/Sexual Orientation
    • Other Classes
  • Management Issues
    • Accommodations
    • Advertising/Applications
    • Complaints/Investigations
    • Employees/Contractors
    • Eviction
    • Leasing
    • Other Issues
  • eAlerts
    • Cases and Settlements
    • HUD News
    • Reports & Studies
    • Other
  • Resources
    • Fair Housing Coach Resources
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
May 30, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Pa. Communities Accused of Posting Discriminatory Ads

Pa. Communities Accused of Posting Discriminatory Ads

Nov 16, 2017

HUD recently charged the owners and operators of two apartment buildings in Altoona, Pa., with violating fair housing law by posting online classified ads that discriminate against families with children.

The case came to HUD’s attention when a fair housing advocacy group filed a complaint accusing the community of repeatedly running ads on Craigslist that discriminate against families with children. Allegedly, one Craigslist ad for a two-bedroom unit read: “Not suitable for children/pets.”

After the ad was posted, the group conducted fair housing testing to determine whether the landlords intended to reserve apartments at the property exclusively for people without children as advertised. Allegedly, the owner told one tester, who was posing as a married man with a pregnant wife and a 3-year-old son, that he wouldn’t show him the unit because it “wouldn’t work out for either of us.” But a second tester, who was posing as a man with no children, was told that the unit would be available in a week. The complaint alleged that a third tester, posing as a married woman with a child, was told that having children was a problem because the unit was located above the leasing office and children would make noise and because there is no yard. According to the complaint, additional testing revealed that the owner demonstrated a preference for renting to applicants who didn’t have children. The charge will be heard by an administrative judge unless either party elects for the case to be heard in federal court.

“No family should be denied the opportunity to rent a home simply because they have children,” Anna Maria Farías, HUD Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, said in a statement. “Today’s enforcement action reaffirms HUD’s commitment to make sure housing providers meet their obligations to treat all applicants fairly, regardless of whether they have kids or not.”

Cases and Settlements
    • Related Articles

      Communities Accused of Applying Discriminatory Blanket Bans on Renters with Criminal Histories

      D.C. Property Managers Accused of Unlawfully Refusing to Rent to Voucher Holders

      Employees Accused of Telling Testers They Discourage Blacks at Alabama Community

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing