• NY Apartment Law
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Guidebooks
  • Archives
  • Protected Classes
  • Management Issues
  • eAlerts
  • Resources
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • NY Apartment Law
  • New York Apartment Law Insider
  • New York Landlord V. Tenant
  • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
  • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
  • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Fair Housing Coach
  • Assisted Housing Management Insider
  • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
  • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Commercial Lease Law Insider
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Protected Classes
  • All Protected Classes
  • Disability
  • Familial Status/Age
  • Race/Color/National Origin
  • Religion
  • Sex/Sexual Orientation
  • Other Classes
  • Management Issues
  • Accommodations
  • Advertising/Applications
  • Complaints/Investigations
  • Employees/Contractors
  • Eviction
  • Leasing
  • Other Issues
  • eAlerts
  • Cases and Settlements
  • HUD News
  • Reports & Studies
  • Other
  • Resources
  • Fair Housing Coach Resources
May 30, 2025
We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 30, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 30, 2025
FHC Logo.webp
  • Archives
  • Protected Classes
    • All Protected Classes
    • Disability
    • Familial Status/Age
    • Race/Color/National Origin
    • Religion
    • Sex/Sexual Orientation
    • Other Classes
  • Management Issues
    • Accommodations
    • Advertising/Applications
    • Complaints/Investigations
    • Employees/Contractors
    • Eviction
    • Leasing
    • Other Issues
  • eAlerts
    • Cases and Settlements
    • HUD News
    • Reports & Studies
    • Other
  • Resources
    • Fair Housing Coach Resources
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
May 30, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Mobile Home Park Pays $100K to Settle Charge of Discriminating Against Families

Mobile Home Park Pays $100K to Settle Charge of Discriminating Against Families

Dec 17, 2015

The owners and operators of a Wisconsin mobile home park recently agreed to pay $100,000 to settle a Justice Department lawsuit alleging that they unlawfully excluded families with children from significant portions of their 230-lot mobile home park. 

The lawsuit arose as a result of a HUD complaint filed by a single mother and a former resident who had tried to complete the sale of a mobile home in the park. They alleged that community owners and managers refused to approve the application for residency of the single mother who planned to purchase the mobile home and live there with her then-2-year-old child because the home was located in an area of the park where the owners did not allow children. After the lawsuit was filed, her residency was approved and she purchased the mobile home, according to the Justice Department. 

Under the settlement, the community agreed to pay $45,000 in damages and rent credits to the two people who filed the HUD complaints; $45,000 into a fund to compensate other alleged victims; and a $10,000 civil penalty. The settlement also requires the community to change its policies to allow families with children throughout the park. 

“Unless a mobile home park meets the very specific requirements to be designated housing for older persons, the owner cannot refuse to sell or rent a home to a family because they have a child,” Gustavo Velasquez, HUD’s Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, said in a statement. “Today’s settlement reaffirms HUD’s determination to work with the Justice Department to ensure that occupancy standards established by housing providers do not violate the Fair Housing Act.”

Cases and Settlements
    • Related Articles

      Mobile Home Park Accused of Discriminating Against African Americans and Families

      Idaho Landlord Pays $15K to Settle Claims of Discrimination Against Families

      Illinois Mobile Home Park Settles Race Discrimination Claims

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing