• NY Apartment Law
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Guidebooks
  • Archives
  • Protected Classes
  • Management Issues
  • eAlerts
  • Resources
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • NY Apartment Law
  • New York Apartment Law Insider
  • New York Landlord V. Tenant
  • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
  • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
  • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Fair Housing Coach
  • Assisted Housing Management Insider
  • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
  • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Commercial Lease Law Insider
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Protected Classes
  • All Protected Classes
  • Disability
  • Familial Status/Age
  • Race/Color/National Origin
  • Religion
  • Sex/Sexual Orientation
  • Other Classes
  • Management Issues
  • Accommodations
  • Advertising/Applications
  • Complaints/Investigations
  • Employees/Contractors
  • Eviction
  • Leasing
  • Other Issues
  • eAlerts
  • Cases and Settlements
  • HUD News
  • Reports & Studies
  • Other
  • Resources
  • Fair Housing Coach Resources
May 29, 2025
We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 29, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 29, 2025
FHC Logo.webp
  • Archives
  • Protected Classes
    • All Protected Classes
    • Disability
    • Familial Status/Age
    • Race/Color/National Origin
    • Religion
    • Sex/Sexual Orientation
    • Other Classes
  • Management Issues
    • Accommodations
    • Advertising/Applications
    • Complaints/Investigations
    • Employees/Contractors
    • Eviction
    • Leasing
    • Other Issues
  • eAlerts
    • Cases and Settlements
    • HUD News
    • Reports & Studies
    • Other
  • Resources
    • Fair Housing Coach Resources
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
May 28, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Seattle Developers Settle Fair Housing Case

Seattle Developers Settle Fair Housing Case

Jun 26, 2014

The owner, builder, architect, and manager of a Seattle community recently agreed to a settlement with HUD to resolve allegations of disability discrimination by failing to design and construct the 56-unit complex in a way that meets the accessibility requirements of the Fair Housing Act (FHA).

The FHA requires that multifamily dwellings constructed for first occupancy after March 13, 1991, contain certain features, including accessible common areas, bathrooms, kitchens, and doors, and environmental controls that can be reached by persons who use wheelchairs.

In its complaint, HUD alleged that the units, referred to as “apodments,” were inaccessible to persons with disabilities because the walkways were too steep; outlets and thermostatic controls were too high; doors had inaccessible thresholds; and bathrooms did not contain enough space for people using wheelchairs. In addition, HUD alleged that the complex’s mailboxes were too high to be reached by individuals using wheelchairs, and the common laundry room was too narrow for wheelchair access.

Under the settlement, the developer and others agreed to modify the project’s public and common use areas and a unit to enhance accessibility. They also agreed to retain the services of an accessibility consultant to conduct onsite inspections of interiors of covered units in all their other recently constructed projects and to make all recommended accessibility retrofits.

“We are pleased to have reached an agreement that will provide accessible housing for persons with disabilities,” Dave Ziaya, HUD’s Acting Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, said in a statement. “The design and construction requirements have been the law for more than two decades and HUD will continue to do all it can to ensure that architects and developers meet their legal obligations to comply.”

Source: HUD

Cases and Settlements
    • Related Articles

      Developers to Pay $350K to Settle Case Alleging Inaccessibility

      New York Owner to Pay $22,500 Penalty to Settle Housing Discrimination Case

      Fair Housing Testing Leads to Discrimination Charges Against 23 Seattle Landlords

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing