We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • December 06, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • December 06, 2025
CLLI_logo_2020.jpg
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Broker's Buzz
    • Drafting Tips
    • In the News
    • Negotiating Tips
    • Plugging Loopholes
    • Traps to Avoid
  • Model Lease Clauses
    • Model Lease Clauses
    • Model Agreements
    • Other Model Tools
  • Q&A
    • Q&A
    • Pop Quiz
    • Winners & Losers
    • Ask the Insider
  • Dos & Don'ts
  • Recent Court Rulings
    • Landlord Wins
    • Landlord Loses
  • eAlerts
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
December 06, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Guarantor on the Hook for Landlord's Consequential Damages

Guarantor on the Hook for Landlord's Consequential Damages

Sep 23, 2022

What Happened: A landlord sued Saks, Inc., for failure to honor a corporate guaranty of its subsidiary’s obligation to pay rent under its shopping center lease. Saks owes us attorneys’ fees and consequential damages covering the loss in the property’s value we suffered due to its breach, the landlord argued. Saks denied liability for consequential damages since such losses were unforeseeable at the time the lease was signed.

Ruling: The Northern District of Illinois federal court sided with the landlord.

Reasoning: The guaranty made the guarantor responsible to “pay to Landlord all damages and all costs and expenses that may arise in consequence of any default by guarantor hereunder (including, without limitation, all reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred by Landlord or caused by any such default and/or by the enforcement of this Guaranty),” the court explained. And the lease specifically required the tenant to pay “All costs and expenses incurred by or on behalf of Landlord, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses, occasioned by any default by Tenant under this Lease which shall constitute additional rent hereunder.” Damages were foreseeable, the court concluded, noting the liquidated damages clause of the lease establishing a specific formula for calculating the landlord’s losses in the event the tenant didn’t pay rent.

  • WEC 98C-4 LLC v. Saks Inc., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140948, 2022 WL 3212369
Owner Wins
    • Related Articles

      Landlord's Settlement with Tenant Doesn't Let Guarantor Off the Hook

      Landlord Not on the Hook for Construction Defects in Improvements

      Oral Lease Modification Doesn’t Get Good Guy Guarantor Off the Hook

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing