We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • December 06, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • December 06, 2025
CLLI_logo_2020.jpg
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Broker's Buzz
    • Drafting Tips
    • In the News
    • Negotiating Tips
    • Plugging Loopholes
    • Traps to Avoid
  • Model Lease Clauses
    • Model Lease Clauses
    • Model Agreements
    • Other Model Tools
  • Q&A
    • Q&A
    • Pop Quiz
    • Winners & Losers
    • Ask the Insider
  • Dos & Don'ts
  • Recent Court Rulings
    • Landlord Wins
    • Landlord Loses
  • eAlerts
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
December 06, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Is Holdover Rent of 200% of Base Rent a Valid Liquid Damages Provision?

Is Holdover Rent of 200% of Base Rent a Valid Liquid Damages Provision?

Jan 26, 2022

What Happened: After siding with the landlord on all claims, a New York court had one more issue to decide, namely, whether the lease clause requiring the tenant to pay 200 percent of base rent as holdover rent was enforceable. The tenant claimed that 200 percent was an unenforceable penalty; the landlord claimed it was a valid liquidated damages provision.

Ruling: The New York court ruled that the clause was enforceable.

Reasoning: As in many states, lease clauses fixing damages in the event of breach are enforceable if the amount “bears a reasonable proportion to the probable loss and the amount of actual loss is incapable or difficult of precise estimation.” In attacking the clause, the tenant had the burden of showing that: (1) 200 percent was disproportionate to the probable loss; and/or (2) the loss could have been estimated at the time the lease was signed. Because the tenant provided evidence supporting neither of these things, the court upheld the clause.

  • ESRT 501 Seventh Ave., L.L.C. v. Regine, LTD.: 2021 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 6193, 2021 NY Slip Op 32524(U)

 

 

Owner Wins
    • Related Articles

      Payment & Acceptance of Holdover Rent ≠ Lease Renewal

      No Full Rent Abatement for Mold When Part of the Space Is Safe

      Tenant Must Pay Holdover Rent Rate in 'Clear and Unambiguous' Lease

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing