• NY Apartment Law
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Guidebooks
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
  • Model Lease Clauses
  • Q&A
  • Dos & Don'ts
  • Recent Court Rulings
  • eAlerts
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • NY Apartment Law
  • New York Apartment Law Insider
  • New York Landlord V. Tenant
  • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
  • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
  • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Fair Housing Coach
  • Assisted Housing Management Insider
  • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
  • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Commercial Lease Law Insider
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Main Articles
  • Features
  • Broker's Buzz
  • Drafting Tips
  • In the News
  • Negotiating Tips
  • Plugging Loopholes
  • Traps to Avoid
  • Model Lease Clauses
  • Model Lease Clauses
  • Model Agreements
  • Other Model Tools
  • Q&A
  • Q&A
  • Pop Quiz
  • Winners & Losers
  • Ask the Insider
  • Recent Court Rulings
  • Landlord Wins
  • Landlord Loses
July 20, 2025
We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • July 20, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • July 20, 2025
CLLI_logo_2020.jpg
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Broker's Buzz
    • Drafting Tips
    • In the News
    • Negotiating Tips
    • Plugging Loopholes
    • Traps to Avoid
  • Model Lease Clauses
    • Model Lease Clauses
    • Model Agreements
    • Other Model Tools
  • Q&A
    • Q&A
    • Pop Quiz
    • Winners & Losers
    • Ask the Insider
  • Dos & Don'ts
  • Recent Court Rulings
    • Landlord Wins
    • Landlord Loses
  • eAlerts
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
July 20, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Lease Clearly Shows that Landlord Owns Tenant Improvements

Lease Clearly Shows that Landlord Owns Tenant Improvements

Jan 23, 2020

What Happened: Erection of a reception desk and bar fixture containing sinks for mixing hair color were among the improvements made at the landlord’s expense before a hair salon tenant moved in and opened shop. The reception desk and color bar were also among the assets the tenant attempted to sell upon vacating the premises seven years later. But the landlord insisted that it owned the fixtures, and the asset sale eventually fell through. So the tenant removed the reception desk and color bar, and the landlord had to rebuild them for the next tenant. Adding insult to injury, the court ruled that the fixtures were “trade fixtures” that the tenant owned and ordered the landlord to pay $20,000 in damages for “conversion”—that is, unlawfully asserting possession over the tenant’s property.

Decision: The Michigan appeals court turned the tables, finding that the tenant committed conversion.

Reasoning: The lease clearly specified that the original improvements were the landlord’s property. The exact language: “Any additions to, or alterations of, the Premises, except trade fixtures, shall upon expiration or termination of the Lease Term become a part of the realty and belongs to the Landlord.” The reception desk and color bar weren’t “trade fixtures” because they were attached to the property, the court reasoned. Moreover, they were mapped in a lease attachment as being part of the property that the tenant had to return at the end of the lease. And because the landlord owned the fixtures, the tenant committed conversion by removing them and had to pay damages to the landlord.

  • Cassidy Rae Studio, LLC v. Bocks: 2019 Mich. App. LEXIS 8373, 2019 WL 7206114
Owner Wins
    • Related Articles

      Landlord that Didn’t Cash Tenant’s Rent Payment Check Didn’t Waive Right to Evict

      Tenant that Terminates Lease Early Must Repay Improvement Costs

      Tenant in Chapter 11 Can't Assume Lease that Expired Before Bankruptcy Filing

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing