What Happened: For five years, a tenant leased space in Houston for use as a bar. After the lease ended, the tenant asked the landlord to return its $11,400 security deposit. When the landlord didn’t respond, it filed a lawsuit. The landlord countersued, claiming that the tenant did roughly $100K worth of damage to the premises. The trial court sided with the tenant, and the landlord appealed.
Decision: The Texas appeals court upheld the lower court’s ruling.
Reasoning: The landlord violated two of the lease’s security deposit provisions, the court said, including the requirement that it provide the tenant:
The landlord didn’t say anything to the tenant about withholding the security deposit until the lawsuit began—eight months after the tenant had vacated and well past the 60-day deadline. And it never provided an itemization of deductions. All it did was assert it spent $25K, and later an additional $73K, on repairs. Compounding the problems was the landlord’s failure to distinguish between costs for alleged repairs for damages and costs for renovations to upgrade the property.