We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 22, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 22, 2025
AHMI Logo.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Certification
    • Compliance
    • Crime & Security
    • Dealing with Households
    • Income Calculations
    • Maintenance
    • Screening Applicants
  • Departments
    • Dos and Don'ts
    • Q and A
    • Recent Court Rulings
    • HUD Audits
    • In the News
    • Ask the Insider
      • Send Us A Question
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
May 22, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » HUD Cites CHRA for Poor Management

HUD Cites CHRA for Poor Management

Mar 14, 2013

 

According to a recently issued HUD report, poor financial oversight, failures to collect on rent, and inadequate internal and budgetary controls leave the Charlottesville Housing and Redevelopment Authority (CHRA) in Charlottesville, Va., vulnerable as federal money dwindles. The agency gave CHRA the local authority 30 days, or until the end of the month, to provide written responses to nine findings of serious violations of statute, regulations, or practice.    

While the authority remains "fiscally sound," it finished fiscal year 2012 in the red, according to the HUD report. Revenues plunged to $5.1 million from $6.9 million the preceding year, a decrease of more than a fourth. Expenses remained relatively level at $6 million in fiscal year 2012.

The report cited a litany of problems plaguing the agency that manages 376 local public housing units. Among the concerns HUD cited: inexperienced and under-trained staff, overcharging some residents and undercharging others for rent, failing to collect unpaid rent, and an ineffective occupancy policy. Among the authority's failings is inadequate tracking of income, especially zero-income families, and the absence of an admissions and continued occupancy policy, the report said. That leaves staff unable to properly enforce public housing rules, risks inconsistent rule enforcement, and causes mistakes, HUD said.

 

Not a subscriber? Click here for a free trial issue!

Online Alerts
    • Related Articles

      OIG Issues Annual Report on HUD’s Top Management Challenges for 2019

      Elderly Housing Report Cites Need to Improve Link to Resident Services

      HUD Announces Homeless Preference Management Fees

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing