• NY Apartment Law
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Guidebooks
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
  • Model Lease Clauses
  • Q&A
  • Dos & Don'ts
  • Recent Court Rulings
  • eAlerts
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • NY Apartment Law
  • New York Apartment Law Insider
  • New York Landlord V. Tenant
  • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
  • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
  • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Fair Housing Coach
  • Assisted Housing Management Insider
  • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
  • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Commercial Lease Law Insider
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Main Articles
  • Features
  • Broker's Buzz
  • Drafting Tips
  • In the News
  • Negotiating Tips
  • Plugging Loopholes
  • Traps to Avoid
  • Model Lease Clauses
  • Model Lease Clauses
  • Model Agreements
  • Other Model Tools
  • Q&A
  • Q&A
  • Pop Quiz
  • Winners & Losers
  • Ask the Insider
  • Recent Court Rulings
  • Landlord Wins
  • Landlord Loses
May 29, 2025
We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 29, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 29, 2025
CLLI_logo_2020.jpg
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Broker's Buzz
    • Drafting Tips
    • In the News
    • Negotiating Tips
    • Plugging Loopholes
    • Traps to Avoid
  • Model Lease Clauses
    • Model Lease Clauses
    • Model Agreements
    • Other Model Tools
  • Q&A
    • Q&A
    • Pop Quiz
    • Winners & Losers
    • Ask the Insider
  • Dos & Don'ts
  • Recent Court Rulings
    • Landlord Wins
    • Landlord Loses
  • eAlerts
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
May 29, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Trial Necessary to Determine Whether Cotenancy Clause Constituted "Liquidated Damages"

Trial Necessary to Determine Whether Cotenancy Clause Constituted "Liquidated Damages"

Apr 10, 2018

Facts: A clothing retailer tenant signed a lease for space at a shopping center. The lease included cotenancy provisions that required the owner to lease space to three major tenants. If all three tenants were open and operating continuously, the retail tenant paid minimum rent. In the event that one or more of those tenants stopped operating, the retail tenant could pay reduced rent and it would be considered a breach of the lease. One of the tenants moved out of its space before the expiration of its lease. The owner found a replacement tenant before the retail tenant could begin paying reduced rent. When the replacement tenant moved out of its space, the retail tenant invoked the cotenancy provisions. The owner argued that the departure of the required tenant didn’t trigger the cotenancy clause because the remaining required tenants still brought foot traffic to the center and the retail tenant’s profits didn’t decrease. According to the owner, the fact that the retail tenant didn’t suffer any economic harm would effectively make the cotenancy provisions “liquidated damages” that were punitive, and not provide the intended result of compensating the retail tenant for its actual damages. Instead, the owner would lose a significant amount of money that was not commensurate with damages.

The retail tenant continued to pay minimum rent “under protest,” and asked a trial court to enforce the provisions. The owner sued the tenant, asking the trial court for a judgment in its favor and to order the tenant to pay minimum rent.

Decision: A Nevada trial court concluded that a trial was necessary.

Reasoning: In explaining its decision, the court noted that, although it might be true that the departure of the tenant and the replacement tenant didn’t economically harm the retail tenant, the owner and retail tenant were sophisticated parties that had negotiated the lease at “arm’s length” with their attorneys and that the owner shouldn’t now try to get out of the provisions it agreed to—that the retail tenant could pay reduced rent rather than minimum rent until a suitable tenant was open and operating in the now-vacant space.

It also addressed the owner’s argument that reduced rent would drastically harm the owner and would therefore qualify as liquidated damages that were designed to be punitive and, therefore, would be unenforceable. The trial court noted that liquated damages were an issue that couldn’t be determined by a judge. Rather, a jury trial was necessary.

  • Boca Park Marketplace Syndications Grp., LLC v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc., March 2018 
Owner Loses
    • Related Articles

      Trial Needed to Determine Whether Site Plan Change Was Permissible

      Trial Required to Determine Whether Owner Took Control of Premises

      Liquidated Damages Clause Is an Unenforceable Penalty

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing
    The Habitat Group Logo
    • NY Apartment Law
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord V. Tenant
      • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
      • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
      • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
    • Fair & Affordable Housing
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
      • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
    • Commercial Lease Law
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
        • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
    • Guidebooks
    • May 29, 2025
    • Log In
    • Log Out
    • My Account
    • Subscribe
    • May 29, 2025
    CLLI_logo_2020.jpg
    • Archives
    • Main Articles
      • Features
      • Broker's Buzz
      • Drafting Tips
      • In the News
      • Negotiating Tips
      • Plugging Loopholes
      • Traps to Avoid
    • Model Lease Clauses
      • Model Lease Clauses
      • Model Agreements
      • Other Model Tools
    • Q&A
      • Q&A
      • Pop Quiz
      • Winners & Losers
      • Ask the Insider
    • Dos & Don'ts
    • Recent Court Rulings
      • Landlord Wins
      • Landlord Loses
    • eAlerts
    Free Issue
    The Habitat Group Logo
    May 29, 2025
    • Log In
    • Log Out
    • My Account