• NY Apartment Law
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Guidebooks
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
  • Model Lease Clauses
  • Q&A
  • Dos & Don'ts
  • Recent Court Rulings
  • eAlerts
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • NY Apartment Law
  • New York Apartment Law Insider
  • New York Landlord V. Tenant
  • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
  • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
  • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Fair Housing Coach
  • Assisted Housing Management Insider
  • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
  • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Commercial Lease Law Insider
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Main Articles
  • Features
  • Broker's Buzz
  • Drafting Tips
  • In the News
  • Negotiating Tips
  • Plugging Loopholes
  • Traps to Avoid
  • Model Lease Clauses
  • Model Lease Clauses
  • Model Agreements
  • Other Model Tools
  • Q&A
  • Q&A
  • Pop Quiz
  • Winners & Losers
  • Ask the Insider
  • Recent Court Rulings
  • Landlord Wins
  • Landlord Loses
June 30, 2025
We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • June 30, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • June 30, 2025
CLLI_logo_2020.jpg
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Broker's Buzz
    • Drafting Tips
    • In the News
    • Negotiating Tips
    • Plugging Loopholes
    • Traps to Avoid
  • Model Lease Clauses
    • Model Lease Clauses
    • Model Agreements
    • Other Model Tools
  • Q&A
    • Q&A
    • Pop Quiz
    • Winners & Losers
    • Ask the Insider
  • Dos & Don'ts
  • Recent Court Rulings
    • Landlord Wins
    • Landlord Loses
  • eAlerts
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
June 30, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Necessity of Future Alterations Didn't Negate Consent Requirement

Necessity of Future Alterations Didn't Negate Consent Requirement

Aug 11, 2015

Facts: A fast-food restaurant franchisee was required to update its space every seven to 10 years in accordance with its franchise agreement. Its lease prohibited the tenant from making any alterations to the interior or exterior of the premises without the owner’s written consent. The tenant performed an extensive remodel to the exterior and interior of the restaurant without consent. After the alterations were completed, the owner informed the tenant that it was in breach of the lease, and it terminated the tenant’s right to possession of the premises without terminating the lease. The owner demanded that the tenant vacate the premises. When it refused, the owner sued it for forcible detainer—that is, immediate possession of the property. A trial court awarded possession to the owner. The tenant appealed.

Decision: A Texas appeals court upheld the trial court’s decision.

Reasoning: The appeals court determined that the owner was entitled to possession of the premises because the tenant had “materially” breached its lease. To determine whether the tenant’s breach of contract was material, the appeals court had to consider: (1) the extent to which the owner will be deprived of the benefit that it reasonably expected; (2) the extent to which the owner can be adequately compensated for the part of that benefit of which it will be deprived; (3) the extent to which the tenant by failing to perform will suffer forfeiture; and (4) the likelihood that the tenant will cure—that is, fix—its failure.

The tenant argued that the altering of the premises without the owner’s consent did not deprive the owner of its primary expected benefit—receipt of rental income. The tenant paid all the rent that was due as well as all other charges required under the lease. However, the payment of rent isn’t relevant to whether the tenant’s breach of altering the property without consent was a material breach, noted the appeals court. The benefit the owner expected from that provision in the lease was that it would have control over alterations to its building. By altering the building without the owner’s consent, the owner had no way to protect itself from alterations that might damage the premises, shorten the building’s lifespan, or alter the commercial profitability of the building.

The owner presented evidence that the commercial profitability of the building was changed because, after the remodel, the restaurant’s sales declined 30 to 40 percent, which the owner blamed largely on the alterations. The owner also presented evidence that it wanted to control the alterations to the building because some types of alterations would shorten the building’s lifespan and the ability to sell it later.

The tenant argued that the owner could anticipate the building would have to be remodeled during the term of the lease because the franchisor required its restaurants be remodeled every seven to 10 years. Although the fact that the premises would have to be remodeled may have been known to the owner, that knowledge didn’t negate the owner’s expectation that the tenant would obtain the owner’s written consent to the alterations before modifying the building, said the appeals court.

  • Fritz Management, LLC v. Huge American Real Estate, Inc., June 2015

 

Owner Wins
    • Related Articles

      Material Changes to Lease Didn't Relieve Guarantors of Rent Liability

      "Frustration of Purpose" Didn’t Terminate Tenant’s Lease

      No Constructive Eviction Where Tenant Didn’t Notify Owner of Sewage Problem

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing
    The Habitat Group Logo
    • NY Apartment Law
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord V. Tenant
      • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
      • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
      • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
    • Fair & Affordable Housing
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
      • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
    • Commercial Lease Law
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
        • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
    • Guidebooks
    • June 30, 2025
    • Log In
    • Log Out
    • My Account
    • Subscribe
    • June 30, 2025
    CLLI_logo_2020.jpg
    • Archives
    • Main Articles
      • Features
      • Broker's Buzz
      • Drafting Tips
      • In the News
      • Negotiating Tips
      • Plugging Loopholes
      • Traps to Avoid
    • Model Lease Clauses
      • Model Lease Clauses
      • Model Agreements
      • Other Model Tools
    • Q&A
      • Q&A
      • Pop Quiz
      • Winners & Losers
      • Ask the Insider
    • Dos & Don'ts
    • Recent Court Rulings
      • Landlord Wins
      • Landlord Loses
    • eAlerts
    Free Issue
    The Habitat Group Logo
    June 30, 2025
    • Log In
    • Log Out
    • My Account