• NY Apartment Law
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Guidebooks
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
  • Model Lease Clauses
  • Q&A
  • Dos & Don'ts
  • Recent Court Rulings
  • eAlerts
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • NY Apartment Law
  • New York Apartment Law Insider
  • New York Landlord V. Tenant
  • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
  • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
  • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Fair Housing Coach
  • Assisted Housing Management Insider
  • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
  • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Commercial Lease Law Insider
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Main Articles
  • Features
  • Broker's Buzz
  • Drafting Tips
  • In the News
  • Negotiating Tips
  • Plugging Loopholes
  • Traps to Avoid
  • Model Lease Clauses
  • Model Lease Clauses
  • Model Agreements
  • Other Model Tools
  • Q&A
  • Q&A
  • Pop Quiz
  • Winners & Losers
  • Ask the Insider
  • Recent Court Rulings
  • Landlord Wins
  • Landlord Loses
July 17, 2025
We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • July 17, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • July 17, 2025
CLLI_logo_2020.jpg
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Broker's Buzz
    • Drafting Tips
    • In the News
    • Negotiating Tips
    • Plugging Loopholes
    • Traps to Avoid
  • Model Lease Clauses
    • Model Lease Clauses
    • Model Agreements
    • Other Model Tools
  • Q&A
    • Q&A
    • Pop Quiz
    • Winners & Losers
    • Ask the Insider
  • Dos & Don'ts
  • Recent Court Rulings
    • Landlord Wins
    • Landlord Loses
  • eAlerts
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
July 17, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Mall's Kiosk Placement Did Not Cause Slip-and-Fall

Mall's Kiosk Placement Did Not Cause Slip-and-Fall

Sep 1, 2010

Facts: A customer sued a shopping mall after she slipped and fell down concrete steps leading to a fountain, because she was looking at merchandise on a kiosk. The customer claimed that the mall's placement of the kiosk in relation to the stairs created a dangerous condition.

During the trial, the customer presented evidence concerning the appropriate placement of kiosks in relation to potential hazards, which was given by an expert witness she had hired. The mall asked the court to exclude the expert witness's testimony because, according to the mall, he was not qualified to render opinions regarding the safe placement of kiosks in retail establishments.

The court granted the mall's request and ruled in its favor. The customer appealed.

Decision: The appeals court upheld the trial court's decision.

Reasoning: The customer's expert witness, who was a visual merchandising expert, testified that kiosks: (1) are specifically designed to attract customers and divert their attention toward the products displayed; (2) are designed to “completely consume” a shopper; and (3) should, therefore, not be placed in close proximity to any potential hazards. According to the expert witness, the mall should have known that the placement of the kiosk created an unreasonable risk of harm to shoppers by being in close proximity to the steps the customer had fallen down.

The appeals court stated that, to establish an expert witness's qualifications, the party using the witness must show that the expert has “knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education” which would qualify him to give an opinion regarding the specific issue in the case. Here, the expert witness conceded that he had never: taken any courses regarding the proper placement of kiosks within retail shopping environments; obtained training of any kind regarding safety issues pertaining to the placement of merchandising structures in retail spaces; or conducted studies or surveys pertaining to applicable standards regarding the placement of kiosks in relation to potentially hazardous conditions.

Moreover, although the expert witness said that he was aware of studies pertaining to safe kiosk placement, he admitted that he had not reviewed any of those studies prior to forming his opinion as to whether the kiosk at issue in this case was placed a proper distance from the stairs. The appeals court determined that, because the expert witness was not qualified, the trial court had properly excluded his testimony and ruled in favor of the mall.

  • Downer v. Simon Property Group Texas, L.P. D/B/A North East Mall, July 2010
Owner Wins
    • Related Articles

      Out-of-Possession Landlord Not Liable for Slip-and-Fall Injuries

      Owner Off Hook for Common Area Slip-and-Fall

      Appeals Court Overturns Jury Verdict in Slip-and-Fall Case

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing
    The Habitat Group Logo
    • NY Apartment Law
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord V. Tenant
      • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
      • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
      • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
    • Fair & Affordable Housing
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
      • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
    • Commercial Lease Law
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
        • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
    • Guidebooks
    • July 17, 2025
    • Log In
    • Log Out
    • My Account
    • Subscribe
    • July 17, 2025
    CLLI_logo_2020.jpg
    • Archives
    • Main Articles
      • Features
      • Broker's Buzz
      • Drafting Tips
      • In the News
      • Negotiating Tips
      • Plugging Loopholes
      • Traps to Avoid
    • Model Lease Clauses
      • Model Lease Clauses
      • Model Agreements
      • Other Model Tools
    • Q&A
      • Q&A
      • Pop Quiz
      • Winners & Losers
      • Ask the Insider
    • Dos & Don'ts
    • Recent Court Rulings
      • Landlord Wins
      • Landlord Loses
    • eAlerts
    Free Issue
    The Habitat Group Logo
    July 17, 2025
    • Log In
    • Log Out
    • My Account