We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • December 05, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • December 05, 2025
CLLI_logo_2020.jpg
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Broker's Buzz
    • Drafting Tips
    • In the News
    • Negotiating Tips
    • Plugging Loopholes
    • Traps to Avoid
  • Model Lease Clauses
    • Model Lease Clauses
    • Model Agreements
    • Other Model Tools
  • Q&A
    • Q&A
    • Pop Quiz
    • Winners & Losers
    • Ask the Insider
  • Dos & Don'ts
  • Recent Court Rulings
    • Landlord Wins
    • Landlord Loses
  • eAlerts
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
December 05, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Tenant's Bounced Check Caused Loss of Purchase Option

Tenant's Bounced Check Caused Loss of Purchase Option

Sep 1, 2006

Aug. 4, 2006—A lease gave a tenant a purchase option on the condition that the tenant pay $10,000 on or before Jan. 1, 2003, to keep the option in effect. The tenant gave the owner a personal check for $10,000 on Jan. 1, 2003. The owner deposited the check on Jan. 2, and the bank dishonored it on Jan. 6 because of insufficient funds. The owner informed the tenant that the purchase option was no longer in effect. The tenant sued the owner, claiming that it had properly performed the condition needed to keep the purchase option in effect.

A Texas appeals court ruled that the purchase option was no longer in effect. Although the lease didn't specify how to pay the option fee, the tenant chose to give the owner a personal, uncertified check “on the last day possible,” the court noted. The tenant's personal check was merely a “conditional payment—conditioned on payment of the check when presented to a bank, said the court. The personal check merely suspended the tenant's obligation to pay the option fee until the check was either paid or dishonored. Because the check was dishonored after Jan. 1, the tenant didn't pay the option fee by the deadline, as required by the lease, said the court.

  • Probus Properties v. Kirby: No. 05-04-01148-CV, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 6923 (Tex. Ct. App. 8/4/06).

Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Related Articles

      Tenant's Bounced Check Caused Loss of Purchase Option

      Don't Let Exercise of Purchase Option End Tenant's Duty to Pay Rent

      Don't Let Exercise of Purchase Option End Tenant's Duty to Pay Rent

    • Related Products

      Best Commercial Lease Clauses, Tenant's Edition

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing