• NY Apartment Law
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Guidebooks
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
  • Model Lease Clauses
  • Q&A
  • Dos & Don'ts
  • Recent Court Rulings
  • eAlerts
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • NY Apartment Law
  • New York Apartment Law Insider
  • New York Landlord V. Tenant
  • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
  • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
  • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Fair Housing Coach
  • Assisted Housing Management Insider
  • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
  • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Commercial Lease Law Insider
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Main Articles
  • Features
  • Broker's Buzz
  • Drafting Tips
  • In the News
  • Negotiating Tips
  • Plugging Loopholes
  • Traps to Avoid
  • Model Lease Clauses
  • Model Lease Clauses
  • Model Agreements
  • Other Model Tools
  • Q&A
  • Q&A
  • Pop Quiz
  • Winners & Losers
  • Ask the Insider
  • Recent Court Rulings
  • Landlord Wins
  • Landlord Loses
June 14, 2025
We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • June 14, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • June 14, 2025
CLLI_logo_2020.jpg
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Broker's Buzz
    • Drafting Tips
    • In the News
    • Negotiating Tips
    • Plugging Loopholes
    • Traps to Avoid
  • Model Lease Clauses
    • Model Lease Clauses
    • Model Agreements
    • Other Model Tools
  • Q&A
    • Q&A
    • Pop Quiz
    • Winners & Losers
    • Ask the Insider
  • Dos & Don'ts
  • Recent Court Rulings
    • Landlord Wins
    • Landlord Loses
  • eAlerts
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
June 14, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » No Lease Termination for Anticipatory Breach

No Lease Termination for Anticipatory Breach

May 26, 2011

Facts: A retail tenant assigned its lease to a drugstore, but asked the owner if it could remain primarily liable for the strip mall space, instead of reducing or entirely relieving itself from liability. The owner objected to the assignment and sued the tenant.

The trial court ruled in favor of the owner. It pointed out that the tenant's lease with the owner provides that the owner is entitled to terminate the lease if the tenant: (1) makes a late rent payment; or (2) is relieved from liability or reduces its liability by assigning or subletting to another business.

The owner claimed that in casual conversations the tenant had persuaded it to treat the drugstore as secondarily liable and to continue treating the tenant as primarily liable. Despite the tenant's continued willingness to be primarily liable for the lease, the owner asserted that the assignment had constituted “sufficient notice of reduced liability as required for termination of the lease.” The trial court ruled in the owner's favor, and the tenant appealed.

The Vermont appeals court determined that the owner did not have the right to terminate the lease without direct notice from the tenant of its reduced liability. And an assignment of the lease or a tenant's financial problems did not amount to direct notice, it added. The owner appealed.

Decision: The Supreme Court of Vermont upheld the decision in favor of the tenant.

Reasoning: The Supreme Court agreed with the appeals court that the assignment was not a signal of reduced liability that the owner could rely on to terminate the lease. That was because the tenant's status was the same before and after the assignment—it was primarily liable for the space.

The owner also argued that the tenant's status as a “shell corporation” was proof of its reduced liability under the lease. According to the owner, shell corporations are financially unstable—and the tenant's alleged financial instability could be interpreted as notice of reduced liability because of the likelihood that a struggling company would not be able to fully pay for the items it was liable for. But the court disagreed with the owner's argument that due to the tenant's supposed lack of financial assets, in the event that the drugstore discontinued rent payments, the tenant would be unable to fulfill its obligations under the lease and the owner would have limited recourse to recover lost rent or income.

The court noted that while there was no dispute that the tenant was a corporation without employees, a bank account, or current income, it was a “special purpose entity”—an operating store that generated significant cash flow that should have provided comfort to the owner that all future obligations could be performed as required under the lease. The tenant's financial status had no bearing on its liability, the court stressed.

The court noted that a commercial owner's right to terminate a lease is directly conditioned upon “actual cessation” of its tenant's liability. And a tenant's financial status did not constitute cessation of that liability. In the absence of direct evidence that a tenant is no longer liable, the owner could not terminate the lease. The court concluded that, as long as the original tenant under a commercial lease—here, the retailer—remains primarily legally responsible
for performance, the lease can be assigned to a third party—here, the drugstore.

  • Downtown Barre Development v. GU Markets of Barre, LLC, April 2011
Owner Loses
    • Related Articles

      Tenant’s Request for Buildout Delay Isn’t an Anticipatory Breach

      Lease Termination Delayed for Tenant to Cure Violations

      Owner's Misrepresentation Justified Lease Termination

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing
    The Habitat Group Logo
    • NY Apartment Law
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord V. Tenant
      • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
      • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
      • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
    • Fair & Affordable Housing
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
      • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
    • Commercial Lease Law
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
        • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
    • Guidebooks
    • June 14, 2025
    • Log In
    • Log Out
    • My Account
    • Subscribe
    • June 14, 2025
    CLLI_logo_2020.jpg
    • Archives
    • Main Articles
      • Features
      • Broker's Buzz
      • Drafting Tips
      • In the News
      • Negotiating Tips
      • Plugging Loopholes
      • Traps to Avoid
    • Model Lease Clauses
      • Model Lease Clauses
      • Model Agreements
      • Other Model Tools
    • Q&A
      • Q&A
      • Pop Quiz
      • Winners & Losers
      • Ask the Insider
    • Dos & Don'ts
    • Recent Court Rulings
      • Landlord Wins
      • Landlord Loses
    • eAlerts
    Free Issue
    The Habitat Group Logo
    June 14, 2025
    • Log In
    • Log Out
    • My Account