We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 24, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 24, 2025
ALI Logo.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Management Basics
    • New Laws & Regs
    • Rent Increases
    • Court Watch
    • Violations
  • Departments
    • Dos & Dont's
    • Q&A
    • In the News
    • Landlord v. Tenant
    • Ask the Insider
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
  • Building Management Calendar
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
May 24, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Consider Challenge to Rent Stabilization Laws

U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Consider Challenge to Rent Stabilization Laws

Oct 4, 2023

On Oct. 2, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to grant a writ of certiorari, a legal order in which a high court reviews a lower court’s decision, to a case challenging the constitutionality of New York’s rent stabilization laws. The lawsuit was initially filed by the Community Housing Improvement Program and Rent Stabilization Association in 2019, shortly after the state passed the Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (HSTPA).

The context: The HSTPA nearly eliminated an owner’s ability to increase rents on vacant apartments and ultimately remove them from rent regulation. Prior to the HSTPA, owners could increase the rent by 20 percent on vacant apartments and hike prices based on the cost of renovations. Owners could then charge market rents once monthly rents reached a certain threshold.

In this lawsuit, the challengers had argued that the regulations amounted to an unconstitutional government taking of private property. However, a pair of decision that came down in February by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit rejected this argument, leading to the final appeal to the nation’s highest court, which has previously, and unanimously, upheld rent stabilization laws.

Although the Supreme Court has said that government regulation of private property can be “so onerous that its effect is tantamount to a direct appropriation or ouster,” in 1992, the court unanimously upheld rent regulations in a ruling about a mobile home park California. The justices reasoned that regulation of the terms of a lease did not amount to the sort of complete government takeover of property that is barred by the Takings Clause.

What’s next: The Supreme Court’s recent decision to not grant a writ of certiorari does not permanently dismiss the chance for the court to rule on legal challenges to rent stabilization laws. Two other sets of landlords are also trying to appeal similar cases to the U.S. Supreme Court, and the Court has not yet weighed in on their applications.

74 Pinehurst LLC asked the Supreme Court to hear its case in May. The petitioners in this case own small apartment buildings and have no parent company. It’s a separate complaint to the CHIP and RSA petition, but both cases were rejected by the Second Circuit in the same opinion in February.

The other petition to the court, filed in May, is by 335-7 LLC. This petition again argues the Rent Stabilization Law violates the Constitution’s Takings Clause. The petitioners in that case describe themselves as “the owners of small and midsize apartment buildings in New York City.” Both remaining cases were relisted by the court for discussion on Oct. 6, and an order could come on Oct. 10.

 

Online Alerts
    • Related Articles

      Supreme Court May Hear Owner's Challenge to Rent Control Laws

      Owner Groups Prepare to Fight Rent Laws in Federal Court

      Federal Appeals Court Rejects Rent Law Challenge

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing