• NY Apartment Law
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Guidebooks
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
  • Departments
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
  • Building Management Calendar
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • NY Apartment Law
  • New York Apartment Law Insider
  • New York Landlord V. Tenant
  • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
  • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
  • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Fair Housing Coach
  • Assisted Housing Management Insider
  • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
  • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Commercial Lease Law Insider
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Main Articles
  • Features
  • Management Basics
  • New Laws & Regs
  • Rent Increases
  • Court Watch
  • Violations
  • Departments
  • Dos & Dont's
  • Q&A
  • In the News
  • Landlord v. Tenant
  • Ask the Insider
May 27, 2025
We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 27, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 27, 2025
ALI Logo.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Management Basics
    • New Laws & Regs
    • Rent Increases
    • Court Watch
    • Violations
  • Departments
    • Dos & Dont's
    • Q&A
    • In the News
    • Landlord v. Tenant
    • Ask the Insider
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
  • Building Management Calendar
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
May 27, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Landlord v. Tenant: March 2022

Landlord v. Tenant: March 2022

Feb 18, 2022

PROCEDURE—COURT

Unemployed Tenant Who Got Large Settlement Couldn’t Rely on Hardship Declaration

Landlord sued to evict tenants for nonpayment of rent. Landlord questioned the validity of a Hardship Declaration filed by tenants.

The court ruled for landlord after holding a hearing. One tenant had applied for SSDI caused by non-COVID-related illness and her lack of income, after her business terminated. Her situation was exacerbated by providing care to her elderly parents. A co-tenant was employed full time and earned $800 a week. Another co-tenant had no work since 2020 due to COVID shutdowns.

But one of the tenants had received $389,000 in settlement of a prior lawsuit. So she had the financial ability to pay rent due, or to pay the cost of moving. And since that tenant’s responsibility for rent payment was joint-and-several, no financial hardship could be found for any of the three tenants.

The court found the Hardship Declaration invalid and ruled that the eviction proceeding could go forward.

  • Russo v. Kiefer: Index No. 21050217, 2021 NY Slip Op 21285, NYLJ No. 1638302742 (Town Ct. Newburgh; 10/25/21)

PRIMARY RESIDENCE

Tenant Primarily Resided in Washington, D.C.

Landlord sued to evict rent-regulated tenant for nonprimary residence. The trial court ruled for landlord.

Tenant appealed and lost. Building employees credibly testified that tenant didn’t use his apartment as his primary residence during the period in question. Tenant’s bank statements showed “consistent activity” in Washington, D.C., for most of the Golub period. Tenant also had a D.C. driver’s license, and kept his pet cat at the D.C. residence. Tenant’s attempts to show that his absence from the NYC apartment was excusable only raised credibility and fact questions for the court.

Since the trial court was in the best position to assess the evidence and witness credibility, the appeals court found no reason that the lower court’s decision couldn’t be reached under fair interpretation of the evidence.

  • Hous. Dev. Assocs. LLC v. Fitzgerald: Index No. 570144/21, 2021 NY Slip Op 51081(U), NYLJ No. 1638284590 (App. T. 1 Dept.; 11/16/21)

 

 

Landlord v. Tenant
    • Related Articles

      Landlord v. Tenant: March 2023

      Landlord v. Tenant: January 2022

      Landlord v. Tenant: April 2022

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing