We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • December 05, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • December 05, 2025
ALI Logo.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Management Basics
    • New Laws & Regs
    • Rent Increases
    • Court Watch
    • Violations
  • Departments
    • Dos & Dont's
    • Q&A
    • In the News
    • Landlord v. Tenant
    • Ask the Insider
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
  • Building Management Calendar
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
December 05, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Court Upholds Water Board’s 2017 Rate Increase and One-Time Credit

Court Upholds Water Board’s 2017 Rate Increase and One-Time Credit

Jan 26, 2018

The state’s highest court recently overturned the lower court ruling that blocked a one-time $183 credit for owners of one-, two-, and three-family dwellings. At the same time, the Water Board increased charges in 2017 for owners of apartment, co-op, and condo buildings. Apartment owners claimed this violated the Public Authorities Law and imposed disproportionate charges on them.

The state’s Court of Appeals ruled that: (a) the Board’s decision to provide credit to some, but not all, customers based on their tax class wasn’t arbitrary or irrational; (b) the Board’s decision to increase rates system-wide while also providing credit to some, but not all, customers was not arbitrary or irrational; and (c) the Board’s system-wide rate increase while also providing credit to some, but not all, customers, didn’t amount to an impermissible tax. The court found that the city’s water and sewer rates may be determined in accordance with public policy goals, not just economic goals. The Board could balance rate-setting with other needs and goals [Prometheus Realty Corp. v. NYC Water Board, December 2017]. After the ruling, Mayor de Blasio announced homeowners would get a $183 credit on an upcoming water bill.

In the News
    • Related Articles

      Water Board Approves 5.6% Water & Sewage Rate Increase

      NYC Water Board to Consider 3.7% Rate Increase for FY 2026

      Water Board to Vote on FY 2019 Water Rate Proposal

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing