• NY Apartment Law
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Guidebooks
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
  • Departments
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
  • Building Management Calendar
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • NY Apartment Law
  • New York Apartment Law Insider
  • New York Landlord V. Tenant
  • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
  • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
  • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Fair Housing Coach
  • Assisted Housing Management Insider
  • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
  • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Commercial Lease Law Insider
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Main Articles
  • Features
  • Management Basics
  • New Laws & Regs
  • Rent Increases
  • Court Watch
  • Violations
  • Departments
  • Dos & Dont's
  • Q&A
  • In the News
  • Landlord v. Tenant
  • Ask the Insider
May 29, 2025
We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 29, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 29, 2025
ALI Logo.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Management Basics
    • New Laws & Regs
    • Rent Increases
    • Court Watch
    • Violations
  • Departments
    • Dos & Dont's
    • Q&A
    • In the News
    • Landlord v. Tenant
    • Ask the Insider
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
  • Building Management Calendar
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
May 29, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Landlord v. Tenant: October 2016

Landlord v. Tenant: October 2016

Sep 23, 2016

Major Capital Improvements

MCI Rent Hike Granted for Building-Wide Carpet Installation

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on building-wide carpet installation. The DRA ruled for landlord, and tenants appealed. Tenants argued that carpet was previously installed in 1995 and that the replaced carpet hadn’t outlived its useful life. But landlord had received no prior MCI rent hike for building-wide carpet installation. So the useful life of the pre-existing carpet didn’t matter. Tenants also argued that landlord replaced the carpet only as the result of a rent reduction order. But tenants didn’t raise this issue before the Rent Administrator.

  • 166 Second Avenue Tenants’ Assoc.: DHCR Adm. Rev. Docket No. CX430042RT (5/27/16)

Procedure—Court

Landlord Must Pay Tenant $4,600 for Discarding Possessions After Eviction

Former tenant sued landlord after he was evicted based on loss of personal property. The marshal removed tenant’s property from the apartment and stored it in landlord’s garage at the building. Tenant went to retrieve some of his things, left others, and told landlord he needed to return a few times to complete the property retrieval. Landlord refused tenant further access and discarded the remaining property. Tenant claimed that the items landlord threw out were worth more than $5,000. But the court’s arbitrator awarded tenant only $4,600 based on what he could prove. Landlord was responsible for negligent damage to tenant’s property because landlord became a bailee when it held tenant’s property after eviction.

  • Crawley v. Johnston: Index No. 2983/2015, NYLJ No. 1202761664465 (Civ. Ct. Queens; 5/30/16)

Rent Increase Ordered

Landlord Gets 1/40th Rent Increase for Painting Tenant’s Apartment

Landlord applied for a rent increase based on painting a rent-controlled tenant’s apartment, since painting wasn’t a service included in tenant’s rent. Landlord submitted copies of a contract and cancelled check showing that the paint job cost $9,920. The DRA ruled for landlord, although it reduced the allowable cost to $9,350, and increased tenant’s maximum collectible rent by $233.75 per month. Tenant appealed and lost. NYC Rent and Eviction Regulations Section 2202.4 allows the DHCR to grant a 1/40th rent increase for first-time painting. 

  • Parker: DHCR Adm. Rev. Docket No. DT420020RT (4/29/16)
Landlord v. Tenant
    • Related Articles

      Landlord v. Tenant: October 2017

      Landlord v. Tenant: January 2016

      Landlord v. Tenant: February 2016

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing