We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 21, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 21, 2025
ALI Logo.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Management Basics
    • New Laws & Regs
    • Rent Increases
    • Court Watch
    • Violations
  • Departments
    • Dos & Dont's
    • Q&A
    • In the News
    • Landlord v. Tenant
    • Ask the Insider
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
  • Building Management Calendar
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
May 21, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Settlement Approved, Stuy Town Seeks Income Boost

Settlement Approved, Stuy Town Seeks Income Boost

Apr 23, 2013

CWCapital Management, the company that controls the Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village, is reportedly planning to boost operating income at the complex before putting it up for sale. CWCapital has been in control of the complex on Manhattan’s East Side since early 2010, when prior owner Tishman Speyer Properties LP and its partners surrendered the property to creditors. The complex’s primary creditors are investors in bonds backed by the building’s mortgage, and Maryland-based CWCapital represents them.

CWCapital recently completed a settlement in a class action that concerned rents on luxury units, agreeing to pay $68.75 million in rent overcharges to tenants. Around 21,250 current and former market-rate tenants who were paying unjustly inflated rents as a result of misinterpreted rent stabilization laws will get checks for an average of $3,200 apiece. But because the case also resulted in rent reductions, the total take by residents comes to about $173.25 million. The company previously had cited the lawsuit as a roadblock to any potential sale, given the uncertainty it would create for buyers.

The company gradually has increased income by converting units with below-market rents into luxury units after they go vacant. Some luxury two-bedroom units go for more than $3,800 a month. Rent at unrenovated apartments can be half that or less. And as of 2009, the last data available, 60 percent of the apartments were below market rate.

In the News
    • Related Articles

      Judge Says Landmark Stuy Town Ruling Applies Retroactively

      MetLife, Stuy Town Tenants Settle Lawsuit

      Stuy Town Owner Halts Upgrades Due to 2019 Rent Law

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing