• NY Apartment Law
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Guidebooks
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
  • Departments
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • NY Apartment Law
  • New York Apartment Law Insider
  • New York Landlord V. Tenant
  • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
  • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
  • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Fair Housing Coach
  • Assisted Housing Management Insider
  • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
  • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Commercial Lease Law Insider
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Main Articles
  • Features
  • Certification
  • Compliance
  • Crime & Security
  • Dealing with Households
  • Income Calculations
  • Maintenance
  • Screening Applicants
  • Departments
  • Dos and Don'ts
  • Q and A
  • Recent Court Rulings
  • HUD Audits
  • In the News
  • Ask the Insider
  • Ask the Insider
  • Send Us A Question
May 17, 2025
We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 17, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 17, 2025
AHMI Logo.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Certification
    • Compliance
    • Crime & Security
    • Dealing with Households
    • Income Calculations
    • Maintenance
    • Screening Applicants
  • Departments
    • Dos and Don'ts
    • Q and A
    • Recent Court Rulings
    • HUD Audits
    • In the News
    • Ask the Insider
      • Send Us A Question
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
May 17, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Resident Not Liable for Actions of Her Guests

Resident Not Liable for Actions of Her Guests

Apr 11, 2019

Facts: A resident’s sister and other guests engaged in a physical and verbal altercation with another resident of the site. The altercation was captured on video, and the police responded to the site. As a result, the owner sent the resident a notice to vacate based on the alleged breach of the lease, the Rules and Regulations, and the state’s landlord-tenant code. The resident didn’t vacate the unit, so the owner sued for possession of the unit.

The lease agreement required that “all tenants and other guests of the premises with the consent of tenant shall conduct themselves in a manner that does not unreasonably interfere with the peaceful enjoyment of the other tenants.” The owner contended that the resident was responsible for the conduct of her guests, and specifically her sister, who engaged in a physical and verbal fight with another resident. That conduct was deemed by the owner to be disruptive to the health, safety, and rights of other tenants to peaceful enjoyment of their premises.

The resident argued that she had no control over her sister and other guests once they left her unit. She further contended the altercation was started by the other resident, and in fact, she took immediate corrective action upon becoming aware of the altercation outside and removed her sister from her building.

Ruling: A Delaware court ruled in favor of the resident.

Reasoning: The court found that the owner couldn’t satisfy the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence that the resident was personally in violation of the lease terms, including the rules and regulations for the site. There was no dispute that an altercation occurred at the site, that the altercation involved the resident’s sister and other guests, and that the altercation occurred outside of the resident’s unit.

But there wasn’t any evidence produced to prove that resident could have reasonably foreseen that there would be a verbal and physical altercation between the other resident and her guests. To the contrary, the other resident testified that she confronted the resident’s guests when she overheard a statement to which she took exception. Upon learning of the altercation outside her apartment building, the resident tried to intervene and calm the situation.

  • Bethel Villas 2009 Assocs. LP v. Berry-Mills, February 2019
Recent Court Rulings
    • Related Articles

      Resident Not Liable for Son's Criminal Actions

      PHA Not Liable for Neighbor’s Actions Against Resident

      PHA May Be Liable for Actions Against Mentally Disabled Resident

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing