We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • December 06, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • December 06, 2025
AHMI Logo.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Certification
    • Compliance
    • Crime & Security
    • Dealing with Households
    • Income Calculations
    • Maintenance
    • Screening Applicants
  • Departments
    • Dos and Don'ts
    • Q and A
    • Recent Court Rulings
    • HUD Audits
    • In the News
    • Ask the Insider
      • Send Us A Question
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
December 06, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Please login below or register to access this content.
Home » Remaining Widow Doesn't Qualify for Elderly Housing

Remaining Widow Doesn't Qualify for Elderly Housing

Nov 19, 2018

Facts: A Section 202 site that provides supportive housing for the elderly sought to evict the wife of a deceased resident. She moved into the unit with her husband in May 2004 and lived there continuously for the past 14 years. Her husband, the tenant of record and head of household, died in September 2013 when his wife was 55 years old. She is currently 60 years old. HUD regulations define “elderly” as 62 years of age or older at the time of initial occupancy.

The owner asked the court for a judgment without a trial on the grounds that the widow can’t remain in the unit after the death of her husband because she doesn’t meet the definition of “elderly.” The owner also asked the court for use and occupancy charges, not under any provision of law, but because it “cannot afford to lose this much income and remain operational” as a not-for-profit Housing Development Fund Corporation.

The widow claimed that the owner, by referring to her as the “tenant,” “spouse,” and “co-head [of household]” in correspondence with the Department of Social Services (DSS), by accepting shelter payments made by DSS on her behalf for two years, and by accepting documents for recertification, has waived its right to proceed against her as a licensee.

Ruling: A New York court ruled in the owner’s favor.

Reasoning: The court found that the site is designated by law as housing for the elderly and this designation couldn’t be waived. In this case, the site’s actions didn’t create a tenancy for the widow by waiver. The purpose of the Section 202 program is to provide housing for the “very low income elderly,” and all units in the project must be made available to individuals who meet this definition. And an “elderly person” is defined as “a household composed of one or more persons at least one of whom is 62 years of age or more at the time of initial occupancy.”

The Housing Act of 1959 was amended in 1990 and further narrowed the class of people that Section 202 housing is meant to benefit. Whereas “elderly families” previously included “the surviving member or members of any family . . . who were living, in a unit assisted under this section, with the deceased member of the family at the time of his or her death,” the amendments made clear that at least one member of the household must at all times be 62 years of age or older.

The owner also pointed out that, in addition to federal law, a HUD Regulatory Agreement, the deed, a Land Disposition Agreement, and a HUD Use Agreement limit occupancy of the premises to persons who are 62 years of age or older. All of these documents, which were executed in 1995, limit occupancy to elderly families and individuals as defined by Section 202 of the United States Housing Act, as amended in 1990.

  • Eugene Smilovic Hous. Dev. Fund Corp. v. Lee, October 2018
Recent Court Rulings
    • Related Articles

      Resident's Sons Don’t Qualify for Unit Succession

      Resident's Widow Has Succession Rights to Unit

      State's Right-to-Remedy Law Doesn't Apply to Public Housing Resident's Eviction

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing