• NY Apartment Law
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Guidebooks
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
  • Departments
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • NY Apartment Law
  • New York Apartment Law Insider
  • New York Landlord V. Tenant
  • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
  • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
  • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Fair Housing Coach
  • Assisted Housing Management Insider
  • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
  • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Commercial Lease Law Insider
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Main Articles
  • Features
  • Certification
  • Compliance
  • Crime & Security
  • Dealing with Households
  • Income Calculations
  • Maintenance
  • Screening Applicants
  • Departments
  • Dos and Don'ts
  • Q and A
  • Recent Court Rulings
  • HUD Audits
  • In the News
  • Ask the Insider
  • Ask the Insider
  • Send Us A Question
May 26, 2025
We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • May 26, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 26, 2025
AHMI Logo.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Certification
    • Compliance
    • Crime & Security
    • Dealing with Households
    • Income Calculations
    • Maintenance
    • Screening Applicants
  • Departments
    • Dos and Don'ts
    • Q and A
    • Recent Court Rulings
    • HUD Audits
    • In the News
    • Ask the Insider
      • Send Us A Question
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
May 25, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » PHA May Be Liable for Using 'Personal Care Sponsor Agreement'

PHA May Be Liable for Using 'Personal Care Sponsor Agreement'

Apr 27, 2012

Facts: When a resident applied for housing at a local PHA, she was offered a lease and a blank copy of a Personal Care Sponsor Agreement (PCS form). The form's preamble stated that, “Applicant upon acceptance for occupancy at the Vernon Housing Authority (VHA) verified his/her personal health condition is favorable for self-maintenance and independent living.” By executing the PCS form, a resident designates a “sponsor,” who accepts various responsibilities such as receiving information and taking action on behalf of the resident should the resident no longer be able.

The resident sued the PHA for discrimination against residents in senior-disabled housing. The resident claimed that the PHA's requirement that residents execute the PCS form as a condition of tenancy violated the Fair Housing Act (FHA).

The PHA claimed that as of July 2011, it stopped publishing or distributing the PCS form and instead uses only HUD Form 92006, which the PHA is required by law to give to all residents. It requires the resident to provide contact information for a person or organization that may be able to assist the resident with any issues that arise, or elect, by checking the appropriate box, not to provide such information. The PHA asked the court for a judgment in its favor without a trial.

Ruling: A Connecticut district court denied the PHA's request and ordered the trial to continue.

Reasoning: The FHA prohibits the making of any statement “with respect to the sale or rental of a dwelling that indicates any preference, limitation, or discrimination based on handicap or an intention to make any such preference, limitation, or discrimination.” According to the court, a statement is prohibited if it suggests to an ordinary reader that a particular protected group is favored or disfavored. And the court explained that a statement that's not on its face discriminatory may nonetheless constitute a violation if the context suggests an impermissible preference.

The PHA claimed that it was entitled to a favorable ruling because the statements contained in the PCS form aren't “‘clearly discriminatory,’” and any further examination into intent is unnecessary. But the court decided that based on the evidence presented, a reasonable jury could conclude that the PCS form tacitly expressed to an ordinary reader that individuals with disabilities were disfavored by the PHA.

  • Maziarz v. Housing Authority of the Town of Vernon, February 2012

Recent Court Rulings
    • Related Articles

      PHA May Be Liable for Owner's Alleged Discrimination Against Disabled Resident

      Memphis PHA May Be Liable for Resident's Wrongful Death

      PHA May Be Liable for Failing to Conduct Annual Reviews of Utility Allowances

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing
    The Habitat Group Logo
    • NY Apartment Law
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord V. Tenant
      • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
      • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
      • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
    • Fair & Affordable Housing
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
      • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
    • Commercial Lease Law
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
        • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
    • Guidebooks
    • May 26, 2025
    • Log In
    • Log Out
    • My Account
    • Subscribe
    • May 26, 2025
    AHMI Logo.webp
    • Archives
    • Main Articles
      • Features
      • Certification
      • Compliance
      • Crime & Security
      • Dealing with Households
      • Income Calculations
      • Maintenance
      • Screening Applicants
    • Departments
      • Dos and Don'ts
      • Q and A
      • Recent Court Rulings
      • HUD Audits
      • In the News
      • Ask the Insider
        • Send Us A Question
    • eAlerts
    • Blogs
    Free Issue
    The Habitat Group Logo
    May 25, 2025
    • Log In
    • Log Out
    • My Account