We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • December 06, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • December 06, 2025
AHMI Logo.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Certification
    • Compliance
    • Crime & Security
    • Dealing with Households
    • Income Calculations
    • Maintenance
    • Screening Applicants
  • Departments
    • Dos and Don'ts
    • Q and A
    • Recent Court Rulings
    • HUD Audits
    • In the News
    • Ask the Insider
      • Send Us A Question
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
December 06, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Annapolis PHA Didn't Properly Administer Its Resident Self-Sufficiency Program

Annapolis PHA Didn't Properly Administer Its Resident Self-Sufficiency Program

Sep 14, 2016

HUD’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) audited the Housing Authority of the City of Annapolis’ Resident Opportunities and Self-Sufficiency (ROSS) program due to a hotline complaint. The complaint alleged that the PHA used ROSS grant funds to pay a resident who didn’t work on a grant. The audit found that the PHA didn’t always administer its ROSS program in accordance with applicable HUD requirements, and the allegation in the complaint had merit.

Specifically, the PHA didn’t maintain documentation to support program accomplishment data reported to HUD for two grants with drawdowns totaling $292,611 and salary and fringe benefit costs totaling $109,248 paid to its service coordinator for one grant. It also incurred $6,850 in ineligible costs for training that HUD hadn’t approved in advance as required for two grants and $3,400 in ineligible costs for payments to a public housing resident who didn’t perform duties related to a grant. In addition, the PHA couldn’t support in-kind service contributions from community partners totaling $243,750 as required. These conditions occurred because the PHA wasn’t aware of requirements and lacked controls over its tenant councils and service coordinators administering the program. As a result, the PHA couldn’t show that disbursements totaling $401,859 complied with program requirements, and it incurred ineligible expenses totaling $10,250.

Auditors recommended that HUD require the PHA to provide documentation to support program accomplishments related to disbursements totaling $292,611 and salary and fringe benefit costs totaling $109,248 or repay HUD from non-federal funds for any amounts that it can’t support. OIG also recommended that HUD require the PHA to repay $6,850 from non-federal funds for the ineligible training costs and $3,400 for the ineligible payments to a public housing resident. OIG further recommended that HUD require the PHA to develop and implement policies, procedures, and controls to ensure that: (1) it complies with program and financial reporting requirements; (2) tenant councils and service coordinators administering the grants comply with applicable requirements; and (3) in-kind contribution amounts are verified.

  • HUD Audit 2016-PH-1006, August 2016
HUD Audits
    • Related Articles

      PHA Didn't Administer Its Section 8 Project-Based Voucher Program Properly

      PHA Didn't Properly Administer Its Housing Choice Voucher Program

      PHA Didn't Administer Its Operating and Capital Funds Properly

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing