Drafting Tips
Establish Clear Ground Rules for Mitigating Damages After a Tenant Defaults
If you have a duty to mitigate, insert lease language that sets limits on your mitigation duties.
Contract Law, 101: When a party breaches a contract, the other party can sue for damages in the amount necessary to put it in the financial position it would have been in had the contract been fulfilled. But limitations apply, including the so-called duty to mitigate damages, which requires the non-breaching party to make some level of reasonable efforts to minimize the financial losses it incurs as a result of the breach. In the context of commercial leasing, mitigation of damages typically means efforts by the landlord to market the property and seek a replacement tenant for the property. The idea is to prevent the landlord from sitting back and allowing the property to remain vacant and the damages to add up, knowing it can charge the tenant for the lost income.
There are at least 27 states that specifically require landlords to mitigate their damages regardless of whether the lease expressly spells this out. Even in states where mitigation isn’t automatically read into the lease, landlords may accept a duty to mitigate voluntarily as part of the lease agreement.
Know the Mitigation Laws of Your State
|
States Where Mitigation Is Required (27) |
States Where Mitigation Is Not Required (unless lease says so) (15) |
States Where It’s Unclear Whether Mitigation Is Required (8) |
|
Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Massachusetts, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming |
Alabama, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Maine, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Virginia |
Alaska, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Nevada, Rhode Island, South Dakota, West Virginia |
Landlords that do have a duty to mitigate, whether via operation of law or voluntary agreement, should insert lease language that clearly explains and sets limits on their mitigation duties. You’ll be in a stronger position to negotiate limits if you’re in a state like New York where landlords are allowed but not required to mitigate damages. Here’s a strategy and Model Lease Clause crafted by a seasoned New York leasing attorney. If you come from a mandatory mitigation state, talk to your attorney about adapting the Model Lease Clause to meet your situation and state requirements.
1. Promise “Commercially Reasonable Efforts” Rather than “Best Efforts”
The first thing you want to clarify is the legal standard by which your mitigation efforts will be measured. There are two basic alternatives that sound the same but have significantly different meanings under contract law:
- “Best efforts,” which requires the mitigating landlord to take all reasonable steps to secure a new tenant for the space, even to its own financial detriment; and
- “Commercially reasonable efforts,” which gives the landlord more leeway to account for its own business interests in finding a replacement tenant.
If permitted by state law, agree to make “commercially reasonable efforts” and not “best efforts” to re-let the premises [Clause, par. a].
2. Require Tenant to Vacate Voluntarily
Make your duty to mitigate conditional on the tenant’s voluntary surrender of the premises. “I feel that a landlord shouldn’t take on a duty to mitigate damages where a tenant doesn’t have the courtesy or decency to vacate voluntarily and must be ousted through the eviction process,” the New York attorney explains [Clause, par. a].
3. List the Actions You Don’t Have to Take to Re-Let
After agreeing to use commercially reasonable efforts to re-let the premises of tenants who voluntarily vacate, list the specific actions that you’re not required to take simply to meet your mitigation duties, which the New York attorney says should include:
- Prioritizing renting the space over other availabilities in the property, which will give you the latitude to bring in other new tenants while the defaulting tenant’s space remains vacant [Clause, par. b(i)];
- Accepting tenants that would force you to modify or undermine your desired tenant mix [Clause, par. b(ii)];
- Leasing the vacant premises on below fair market terms, as you determine at your sole discretion [Clause, par. b(iii)];
- Accepting tenants that don’t meet your creditworthiness or other financial standards—mitigation shouldn’t require you to lease to tenants you deem unqualified and wouldn’t normally accept [Clause, par. b(iv)];
- Contracting with any party that doesn’t meet the requirements of any mortgage or ground lease on the property [Clause, par. b(v)];
- Accepting a tenant that may impose an increased burden on the building’s facilities, infrastructure, or services [Clause, par. b(vi)]; and
- Accepting a tenant represented by a broker or agent who asks you to pay a commission in an amount or on terms that you deem unacceptable [Clause, par. b(vii)].
