We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • December 05, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • December 05, 2025
The Habitat Group Logo
December 05, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Court Nixes Resident’s Civil Rights Money Damages Lawsuit Against PHA for Fatal Fire
Recent Court Rulings

Court Nixes Resident’s Civil Rights Money Damages Lawsuit Against PHA for Fatal Fire

Oct 6, 2025
Glenn S. Demby

What Happened: A 5-year-old autistic boy living in an insect-infested Philadelphia public housing building with no working smoke detectors set fire to the bugs crawling in his family’s Christmas tree, lighting a blaze that burned down the building and killed 12 people. A resident who survived the fire sued the PHA under Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act, a federal law that allows individuals to sue government officials for money damages for violating their constitutional rights. The resident in this case claimed that the PHA deliberately placed him in danger (thereby violating his 14th Amendment right not to be deprived of life and property without due process) by: (a) not allowing him and his family to transfer out of their overcrowded unit; and (b) deliberately concealing that the smoke detectors in the unit weren’t working. 

Ruling: The Pennsylvania federal court ruled that the resident didn’t have a valid Section 1983 claim and dismissed the case without a trial. 

Reasoning: One of the things the resident had to prove to make out a so-called “state-created danger” claim under Section 1983 is that the harm the defendant’s actions caused was “foreseeable and fairly direct.” While the harms might have been foreseeable, court reasoned that the link between the PHA’s actions and the harms was “too far removed to satisfy the fairly direct causation requirement,” noting that: 

  • The fire occurred seven months after the PHA renewed the lease on the resident’s overcrowded unit;
  • The resident knew the unit was overcrowded but deliberately chose to live there; and
  • There was no evidence of a “direct causal link” between the use of noncompliant smoke detectors and the harm—the contention that all residents would have been able to safely evacuate had the detectors been work was mere “theory rest[ing] on speculative assumptions,” according to the court.

 

  • Robinson v. Phila. Hous. Auth., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151637, 2025 LX 334387, 2025 WL 2263438

 

Recent Court Rulings
    • Related Articles

      Airbnb Host’s Civil Rights Lawsuit Against City Advances

      Class Action Lawsuit for Mold Injuries Can Continue Against PHA

      Insurer Must Defend Site Owner Against Fire-Related Lawsuit

    • Related Products

      NYC Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker (Database Access + Monthly Digest for 1 Year)

    • Related Events

      Deliver Fire & Emergency Safety Plan to building employees and current occupants.

      Distribute fire safety plan to current occupants & building employees.

      Use New Year’s Day building schedule(s) for building employees.

    Glenn demby headshot
    Glenn Demby

    Managing Vacancies: Collect Rent from Small Tenant While Searching for Big Tenant

    More from this author
    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing