• NY Apartment Law
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Guidebooks
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
  • Departments
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • NY Apartment Law
  • New York Apartment Law Insider
  • New York Landlord V. Tenant
  • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
  • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
  • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
  • Fair Housing Coach
  • Assisted Housing Management Insider
  • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
  • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
  • Commercial Lease Law Insider
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
  • Main Articles
  • Features
  • Certification
  • Compliance
  • Crime & Security
  • Dealing with Households
  • Income Calculations
  • Maintenance
  • Screening Applicants
  • Departments
  • Dos and Don'ts
  • Q and A
  • Recent Court Rulings
  • HUD Audits
  • In the News
  • Ask the Insider
  • Ask the Insider
  • Send Us A Question
June 11, 2025
We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
The Habitat Group Logo
  • NY Apartment Law
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord V. Tenant
    • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
    • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • Fair & Affordable Housing
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
  • Commercial Lease Law
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
  • Guidebooks
  • June 11, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • June 11, 2025
AHMI Logo.webp
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Features
    • Certification
    • Compliance
    • Crime & Security
    • Dealing with Households
    • Income Calculations
    • Maintenance
    • Screening Applicants
  • Departments
    • Dos and Don'ts
    • Q and A
    • Recent Court Rulings
    • HUD Audits
    • In the News
    • Ask the Insider
      • Send Us A Question
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
Free Issue
The Habitat Group Logo
June 11, 2025
  • Log In
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » PHA Didn't Adhere to Unit Inspection Requirements

PHA Didn't Adhere to Unit Inspection Requirements

Aug 14, 2018

HUD’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) audited the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Housing Authority’s Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program. The audit objective was to determine whether the PHA administered its program units in accordance with HUD’s and its own requirements.

Auditors found that the PHA didn’t always administer its program units in accordance with HUD’s and its own requirements. Specifically, it didn’t always comply with: (1) HUD’s third-party requirements for conducting inspections and rent reasonableness determinations for PHA-owned units; (2) its requirements for conducting unit inspections in a timely manner; and (3) HUD’s housing quality standards for the program units.

HUD requires that PHA-owned units be inspected by an independent agency [24 CFR 982.352(b)(1)(iv)(A)(3)]. However, the PHA failed to comply with the requirement when it inappropriately conducted unit inspections on some PHA-owned units, instead of having an independent entity do them. Although it obtained the services of an independent entity to perform unit inspections, the PHA conducted additional inspections without seeking further services of the independent entity.

Auditors also found that: (1) the PHA didn’t follow HUD’s requirements for performing unit inspections and wasn’t familiar with the requirements for rent reasonableness determinations; (2) its inspection software was inadequate for scheduling inspections; and (3) it didn’t perform the required quality control inspections. As a result, HUD and the PHA lacked assurance that the unit inspections and rent reasonableness determinations were properly conducted and units were eligible to be on the program, and some residents lived in inadequately maintained units. In addition, auditors found that the PHA inappropriately paid nearly $147,000 in housing assistance payments and received more than $20,000 in administrative fees for the units cited in the audit report.

OIG recommended that the Director of HUD’s Louisville, Ky., Office of Public and Indian Housing require: (1) the PHA to reimburse its program more than $167,000 from nonfederal funds; (2) coordinate with HUD and provide adequate training to its staff to ensure compliance with HUD’s requirements; (3) upgrade its inspection software system or develop and implement an alternative method for timeliness of unit inspections; (4) perform all housing quality standards quality control inspections as required; and (5) ensure that all violations cited for units failing to meet housing quality requirements have been corrected and certify that the units meet program requirements.

  • HUD Audit 2018-AT-1006
HUD Audits
    • Related Articles

      Indiana PHA Didn’t Always Comply with Housing Choice Voucher Requirements

      Irvington PHA Didn’t Always Follow Public Housing Program Requirements

      PHA Didn't Comply with Conflict-of-Interest Requirements

    • Publications
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Co-op & Condo Case Law Tracker Digest
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord v. Tenant
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    • Additional Links
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Group Subscriptions
      • Privacy Policy
    • Boards of Advisors
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
    ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Content: The Habitat Group. CMS, Hosting & Web Development: ePublishing
    The Habitat Group Logo
    • NY Apartment Law
      • New York Apartment Law Insider
      • New York Landlord V. Tenant
      • Co-Op & Condo Case Law Digest
      • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, Fourth Edition
      • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
    • Fair & Affordable Housing
      • Fair Housing Coach
      • Assisted Housing Management Insider
      • Tax Credit Housing Management Insider
      • Fair Housing Boot Camp. Basic Training For New Hires
    • Commercial Lease Law
      • Commercial Lease Law Insider
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
        • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17/e
      • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant's Edition
    • Guidebooks
    • June 11, 2025
    • Log In
    • Log Out
    • My Account
    • Subscribe
    • June 11, 2025
    AHMI Logo.webp
    • Archives
    • Main Articles
      • Features
      • Certification
      • Compliance
      • Crime & Security
      • Dealing with Households
      • Income Calculations
      • Maintenance
      • Screening Applicants
    • Departments
      • Dos and Don'ts
      • Q and A
      • Recent Court Rulings
      • HUD Audits
      • In the News
      • Ask the Insider
        • Send Us A Question
    • eAlerts
    • Blogs
    Free Issue
    The Habitat Group Logo
    June 11, 2025
    • Log In
    • Log Out
    • My Account