• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
The Habitat Group

The Habitat Group

|
Subscribe Log In
  • NY APARTMENT LAW
    • New York Apartment Law Insider
    • New York Landlord v. Tenant
    • New York Rent Regulation Checklist, 4th Edition
    • 2026 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
  • FAIR & AFFORDABLE HOUSING
    • Fair Housing Coach
    • Assisted Housing Management Insider
    • FAIR HOUSING BOOT CAMP Basic Training for New Hires
  • COMMERCIAL LEASE LAW
    • Commercial Lease Law Insider
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses, 17th Edition
    • Best Commercial Lease Clauses: Tenant’s Edition
  • RESOURCES / GUIDEBOOKS
Assisted Housing Management Insider
  • Archives
  • Main Articles
    • Feature
    • Certification
    • Compliance
    • Crime & Security
    • Dealing with Households
    • Income Calculations
    • Maintenance
    • Screening Applicants
  • Departments
    • Dos & Don’ts
    • Q & A
    • Recent Court Rulings
    • HUD Audits
    • In the News
  • eAlerts
  • Blogs
  • FREE ISSUE

This is your free article for the month.

To view more articles, Log In or Subscribe.

PHA Didn’t Adhere to Unit Inspection Requirements

August 14, 2018

HUD’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) audited the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Housing Authority’s Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program. The audit objective was to determine whether the PHA administered its program units in accordance with HUD’s and its own requirements.

Auditors found that the PHA didn’t always administer its program units in accordance with HUD’s and its own requirements. Specifically, it didn’t always comply with: (1) HUD’s third-party requirements for conducting inspections and rent reasonableness determinations for PHA-owned units; (2) its requirements for conducting unit inspections in a timely manner; and (3) HUD’s housing quality standards for the program units.

HUD requires that PHA-owned units be inspected by an independent agency [24 CFR 982.352(b)(1)(iv)(A)(3)]. However, the PHA failed to comply with the requirement when it inappropriately conducted unit inspections on some PHA-owned units, instead of having an independent entity do them. Although it obtained the services of an independent entity to perform unit inspections, the PHA conducted additional inspections without seeking further services of the independent entity.

Auditors also found that: (1) the PHA didn’t follow HUD’s requirements for performing unit inspections and wasn’t familiar with the requirements for rent reasonableness determinations; (2) its inspection software was inadequate for scheduling inspections; and (3) it didn’t perform the required quality control inspections. As a result, HUD and the PHA lacked assurance that the unit inspections and rent reasonableness determinations were properly conducted and units were eligible to be on the program, and some residents lived in inadequately maintained units. In addition, auditors found that the PHA inappropriately paid nearly $147,000 in housing assistance payments and received more than $20,000 in administrative fees for the units cited in the audit report.

OIG recommended that the Director of HUD’s Louisville, Ky., Office of Public and Indian Housing require: (1) the PHA to reimburse its program more than $167,000 from nonfederal funds; (2) coordinate with HUD and provide adequate training to its staff to ensure compliance with HUD’s requirements; (3) upgrade its inspection software system or develop and implement an alternative method for timeliness of unit inspections; (4) perform all housing quality standards quality control inspections as required; and (5) ensure that all violations cited for units failing to meet housing quality requirements have been corrected and certify that the units meet program requirements.

  • HUD Audit 2018-AT-1006
HUD Audits

Related Articles

  • HUD Didn’t Adequately Oversee Physical Condition of RAD Voucher Conversions
  • PHA Didn’t Have Adequate Oversight of Lead-Based Paint in Its Housing
  • OIG: HUD Should Improve Oversight of Sites with Low Inspection Scores

Email A Friend

https://www.thehabitatgroup.com/pha-didnt-adhere-to-unit-inspection-requirements/

Primary Sidebar

Popular Stories

  • February 2026 Coach’s Quiz
    Jan 20, 2026 | Heather Stone
    Fair Housing Coach
  • HUD Ends Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule—Again
    Mar 5, 2025 | Eric Yoo
  • HUD Delays Implementation of the HOME Final Rule Until April
    Mar 5, 2025 | Eric Yoo
  • How to Count Income of Student Household Members Under New Rules
    Mar 5, 2025 | Eric Yoo
    Download: MODEL_STUDENT-FINANCIAL-AID-AFFIDAVIT_0325.pdf
  • 2025 New York City Apartment Management Checklist
    Feb 11, 2025
  • Sign Up for a FREE Issue ofAssisted Housing Management Insider
    Jan 4, 2025
    Assisted Housing Management Insider
  • Sign Up for a FREE Issue ofFair Housing Coach
    Jan 4, 2025
    Fair Housing Coach
  • Sign Up for a FREE Issue of New York Apartment Law Insider
    Jan 4, 2025
    New York Apartment Law Insider
  • Sign Up for a FREE Issue of Commercial Lease Law Insider
    Jan 4, 2025
    Commercial Lease Law Insider
  • Complete Annual Bedbug Reporting Requirement by Dec. 31
    Nov 22, 2024

Footer

Publications

Assisted Housing Management Insider
Commercial Lease Law Insider
Fair Housing Coach
New York Apartment Law Insider
New York Landlord v. Tenant

Additional Links

Contact Us
Advertise
Group Subscriptions
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use

Boards of Advisors

Assisted Housing Management Insider
Commercial Lease Law Insider
Fair Housing Coach
New York Apartment Law Insider

Copyright © 2026 · The Habitat Group / Plain Language Media · 1-888-729-2315 · customerservice@thehabitatgroup.com · Log in